TY - JOUR T1 - Cost-effectiveness of sleeping sickness elimination campaigns in five settings of the Democratic Republic of Congo JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.08.25.20181982 SP - 2020.08.25.20181982 AU - Marina Antillon AU - Ching-I Huang AU - Ronald E. Crump AU - Paul E. Brown AU - Rian Snijders AU - Erick Mwamba Miaka AU - Matt J. Keeling AU - Kat S. Rock AU - Fabrizio Tediosi Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/08/2020.08.25.20181982.abstract N2 - Gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (gHAT) is marked for elimination of transmission (EOT) by 2030, but the disease persists in several low-income countries. We coupled transmission and health outcomes models to examine the cost-effectiveness of four gHAT elimination strategies in in five settings – spanning low- to high-risk – of the Democratic Republic of Congo. Alongside passive screening (PS) in fixed health facilities, the strategies included active screening (AS) at average or intensified coverage levels, alone or with vector control (VC) with a scale-back algorithm when no cases were reported for three consecutive years. In high or moderate-risk settings, costs of gHAT strategies are primarily driven by AS and, if used, VC. Due to the cessation of AS and VC, most investments (75-80%) will be made by 2030 and VC might be cost-saving while ensuring EOT. In low-risk settings, costs are driven by PS, and minimum-cost strategies consisting of AS and PS lead to EOT by 2030 with high probability.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (www.gatesfoundation.org) through the Human African Trypanosomiasis Modelling and Economic Predictions for Policy (HAT MEPP) project [OPP1177824] (MA, CH, REC, PB, MJK, KSR, and FT), through the NTD Modelling Consortium [OPP1184344, OPP1156227, and OPP1186851] (KSR and MJK), and through the TRYP-ELIM-BANDUNDU project [OPP1155293] (EMM and RS) and the Directorate-general Development Cooperation and Humanitarian Aid (EMM). The funders of the study had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Because no personal data were used (only projections and data from the literature) the submitted work is exempt from ethics oversight.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesFull model (including the fitting code) and documentation are available through OpenScienceFramework (OSF). https://osf.io/xbwte/ ER -