RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Association of Shared Care Networks with Heart Failure Excessive Hospital Readmissions
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.04.07.21255061
DO 10.1101/2021.04.07.21255061
A1 Diego Pinheiro
A1 Ryan Hartman
A1 Jing Mai
A1 Erick Romero
A1 Saad Soroya
A1 Carmelo Bastos-Filho
A1 Ricardo Lima
A1 Michael Gibson
A1 Imo Ebong
A1 Julie T. Bidwell
A1 Miriam Nuño
A1 Martin Cadeiras
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/07/2021.04.07.21255061.abstract
AB Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the impact of shared care networks on heart failure readmission rates.Background Higher-than-expected heart failure (HF) readmissions affect half of US hospitals every year. The Hospital Reduction Readmission Program (HRRP) has reduced risk-adjusted readmissions, but it has also produced unintended consequences. Shared care models have been advocated for HF care, but the association of shared care networks with HF readmissions has never been investigated.Methods We curated publicly available data on hospital discharges and HF excessive readmission ratios (ERRs) from hospitals in California between 2012 and 2017. Shared Care Areas (SCAs) were delineated as data-driven units of care coordination emerging from discharge networks. The localization index (LI), the proportion of patients who reside in the same SCA in which they are admitted, were calculated by year. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) were used to evaluate the association between the LI and the ERR of hospitals controlling for race/ethnicity and socioeconomics factors.Results A total of 300 hospitals in California in a 6-yr period were included. The HF excessive readmission ratio (ERR) was negatively associated with the localization index (beta: -0.0474; 95% CI: -0.082 to -0.013). The percentage of Black residents within the SCAs was the only statistically significant covariate (beta: 0.4128; 95% CI: 0.302 to 0.524).Conclusions Higher-than-expected HF readmissions were associated with shared care networks. Control mechanisms such as the HRRP may need to characterize and reward shared care to guide hospitals towards a more organized HF care system.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding was received.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:. Ethical approval was not necessary because all data used in this work is made publicly available by the Hospital Reduction Readmission Program (HRRP) and Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data used in this work is made publicly available by the Hospital Reduction Readmission Program (HRRP) and Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD). https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/AcuteInpatientPPS/Readmissions-Reduction-Program ERRExcess Readmission RatioFYFiscal YearGEEGeneralized Estimating EquationHRRPHospital Readmission Reduction ProgramLILocalization IndexSCAShared Care AreaZCTAZIP (Code) Tabulation Area