RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Equity Impacts of Dollar Store Vaccine Distribution
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.04.03.21254847
DO 10.1101/2021.04.03.21254847
A1 Judith A. Chevalier
A1 Jason L. Schwartz
A1 Yihua Su
A1 Kevin R. Williams
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/05/2021.04.03.21254847.abstract
AB We use geospatial data to examine the unprecedented national program currently underway in the United States to distribute and administer vaccines against COVID-19. We quantify the impact of the proposed federal partnership with the company Dollar General to serve as vaccination sites and compare vaccine access with Dollar General to the current Federal Retail Pharmacy Partnership Program. Although dollar stores have been viewed with skepticism and controversy in the policy sector, we show that, relative to the locations of the current federal program, Dollar General stores are disproportionately likely to be located in Census tracts with high social vulnerability; using these stores as vaccination sites would greatly decrease the distance to vaccines for both low-income and minority households. We consider a hypothetical alternative partnership with Dollar Tree and show that adding these stores to the vaccination program would be similarly valuable, but impact different geographic areas than the Dollar General partnership. Adding Dollar General to the current pharmacy partners greatly surpasses the goal set by the Biden administration of having 90% of the population within 5 miles of a vaccine site. We discuss the potential benefits of leveraging these partnerships for other vaccinations, including against influenza.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementChevalier and Williams received financial support from the Tobin Center at Yale University. No other external funding was received.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This paper uses only government data and commercial data and data from public websites. This research is not human subjects research.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAvailable from authors upon request (JC)