TY - JOUR T1 - Comparing Metapopulation Dynamics of Infectious Diseases under Different Models of Human Movement JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.04.05.20054304 SP - 2020.04.05.20054304 AU - Daniel T. Citron AU - Carlos A. Guerra AU - Andrew J. Dolgert AU - Sean L. Wu AU - John M. Henry AU - Héctor M. Sánchez C AU - David L. Smith Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/31/2020.04.05.20054304.abstract N2 - Newly available data sets present exciting opportunities to investigate how human population movement contributes to the spread of infectious diseases across large geographical distances. It is now possible to construct realistic models of infectious disease dynamics for the purposes of understanding global-scale epidemics. Nevertheless, a remaining unanswered question is how best to leverage the new data to parameterize models of movement, and whether one’s choice of movement model impacts modeled disease outcomes. We adapt three well-studied models of infectious disease dynamics, the SIR model; the SIS model; and the Ross-Macdonald model, to incorporate either of two candidate movement models. We describe the effect that the choice of movement model has on each disease model’s results, finding that in all cases there are parameter regimes where choosing one movement model instead of another has a profound impact on epidemiological outcomes. We further demonstrate the importance of choosing an appropriate movement model using the applied case of malaria transmission and importation on Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea, finding that one model produces intelligible predictions of R0 while the other produces nonsensical results.Significance Statement Newly available large-scale datasets of human population movement represent an opportunity to model how diseases spread between different locations. Combining infectious disease models with mechanistic models of host movement enables studies of how movement drives disease transmission and importation. Here we explore in what ways modeled epidemiological outcomes may be sensitive to the modeler’s choice of movement model structure. We use three different mathematical models of disease transmission to show how a model’s epidemiological predictions can change dramatically depending on the chosen host movement model. We find these different outcomes are robust to using the same data sources to parameterize each candidate model, which we illustrate using an example of real-world malaria transmission and importation in Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementWe acknowledge support from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Grant OPP1110495.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData and supporting code are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12084831.v2 https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12084831.v2 ER -