RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Healthcare workers’ perceptions and attitudes towards the UK’s COVID-19 vaccination programme
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.03.30.21254459
DO 10.1101/2021.03.30.21254459
A1 Louisa Manby
A1 Anna Dowrick
A1 Amelia Karia
A1 Laura Maio
A1 Caroline Buck
A1 Georgina Singleton
A1 Sasha Lewis-Jackson
A1 Inayah Uddin
A1 Samantha Vanderslott
A1 Sam Martin
A1 Cecilia Vindrola-Padros
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/31/2021.03.30.21254459.abstract
AB Objectives To explore healthcare workers’ (HCWs) perceptions and attitudes towards the COVID-19 vaccination programme in the UK, including their expectations, concerns and views on whether to promote vaccination to others. To understand the key factors shaping HCWs’ attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination in the UK.Design This study was designed as a rapid qualitative appraisal integrating data from a review of UK policies and guidance on COVID-19 vaccination with data from in-depth semi-structured telephone interviews with frontline HCWs in the UK. Data were analysed using framework analysis.Participants Interviews were carried out with a purposive sample of HCWs from two large London-based hospital Trusts (n=24) and 24 government policies and guidelines on the vaccination programme were reviewed.Results The level of uncertainty about the vaccines’ long-term safety and efficacy against mutant strains made it difficult for HCWs to balance the benefits against the risks of vaccination. HCWs felt that government decisions on vaccine rollout had not been supported by evidence-based science and this impacted their level of trust and confidence in the programme. The spread of misinformation online also impacted HCWs’ attitudes towards vaccination, particularly among junior level and Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) HCWs. Most HCWs felt encouraged to promote vaccination to their patients and the majority said they would advocate vaccination or engage in conversations about vaccination with others when relevant.Conclusion In order to improve HCWs’ trust and confidence in the UK’s COVID-19 vaccination programme, there needs to be clarity about what is known and not known about the vaccines and transparency around the evidence-base supporting government decisions on vaccine rollout. Effort is also needed to dispel the spread of vaccine-related misinformation online and to address specific concerns, particularly among BAME and junior level HCWs.Strengths and limitations of this studyThis is the first qualitative study to understand the factors influencing healthcare workers’ (HCWs) attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination in the UKThis study integrated interview and policy data and captured HCWs’ perceptions and attitudes in real-time as the vaccination programme was being rolled out in the UKOur interview study sample was limited in its representation of junior level HCWs and areas of the UKThis research may have been impacted by selection bias as those with stronger views on vaccination may have been more likely to participate in the studyCompeting Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe study did not receive external funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The UCL/UCLH Joint Research Office provided sponsorship approval for the study. The study was reviewed and approved by the Health Research Authority (HRA) (IRAS: 282069), a national system for the governance of health research in the UK (including ethical review). The individual research offices (Research and Development (R&D) offices) of the hospitals where the study took place also reviewed and approved the study.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll relevant data are included in the manuscript.