PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Cesar A. Lopez AU - Clark H. Cunningham AU - Sierra Pugh AU - Katerina Brandt AU - Usaphea P. Vanna AU - Matthew J. Delacruz AU - Quique Guerra AU - Samuel Jacob Goldstein AU - Yixuan J. Hou AU - Margaret Gearhart AU - Christine Wiethorn AU - Candace Pope AU - Carolyn Amditis AU - Kathryn Pruitt AU - Cinthia Newberry-Dillon AU - John Schmitz AU - Lakshmanane Premkumar AU - Adaora A. Adimora AU - Michael Emch AU - Ross Boyce AU - Allison E. Aiello AU - Bailey K. Fosdick AU - Daniel B. Larremore AU - Aravinda M. de Silva AU - Jonathan J Juliano AU - Alena J. Markmann TI - Disparities in SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among individuals presenting for care in central North Carolina over a six-month period AID - 10.1101/2021.03.25.21254320 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.03.25.21254320 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/30/2021.03.25.21254320.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/30/2021.03.25.21254320.full AB - Background Robust community-level SARS-CoV-2 prevalence estimates have been difficult to obtain in the American South and outside of major metropolitan areas. Furthermore, though some previous studies have investigated the association of demographic factors such as race with SARS-CoV-2 exposure risk, fewer have correlated exposure risk to surrogates for socioeconomic status such as health insurance coverage.Methods We used a highly specific serological assay utilizing the receptor binding domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike-protein to identify SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in remnant blood samples collected by the University of North Carolina Health system. We estimated the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in this cohort with Bayesian regression, as well as the association of critical demographic factors with higher prevalence odds.Findings Between April 21st and October 3rd of 2020, a total of 9,624 unique samples were collected from clinical sites in central NC and we observed a seroprevalence increase from 2·9 (1·7, 4·3) to 9·1 (7·2, 11·1) over the study period. Individuals who identified as Latinx were associated with the highest odds ratio of SARS-CoV-2 exposure at 7·77 overall (5·20, 12·10). Increased odds were also observed among Black individuals and individuals without public or private health insurance.Interpretation Our data suggests that for this care-accessing cohort, SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence was significantly higher than cumulative total cases reported for the study geographical area six months into the COVID-19 pandemic in North Carolina. The increased odds of seropositivity by ethnoracial grouping as well as health insurance highlights the urgent and ongoing need to address underlying health and social disparities in these populations.Evidence before this study We searched PubMed for studies published through March 21st, 2021. We used search terms that included “COVID-19”, “SARS-CoV-2”, “prevalence” and “seroprevalence”. Our search resulted in 399 papers, from which we identified 58 relevant studies describing SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence at sites around the United States from March 1 to December 9, 2020, 12 of which utilized remnant clinical samples and three of which overlapped with our study area. Most notably, one study of 4,422 asymptomatic inpatients and outpatients in central NC from April 28-June 19, 2020 found an estimated seroprevalence of 0·7 −0·8%, and another study of 177,919 inpatients and outpatients (3,817 from NC) from July 27-September 24, 2020 found an estimated seroprevalence of 2·5 −6·8%.Added value of this study This is the largest SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence cohort published to date in NC. Importantly, we used a Bayesian framework to account for uncertainty in antibody assay sensitivity and specificity and investigated seropositivity by important demographic variables that have not yet been studied in this context in NC. This study corroborates other reports that specific demographic factors including race, ethnicity and the lack of public or private insurance are associated with elevated risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Furthermore, in a subset of serum samples, we identify other SARS-CoV-2 antibodies elicited by these individuals, including functionally neutralizing antibodies.Implications of all the available evidence It is difficult to say the exact seroprevalence in the central North Carolina area, but a greater proportion of the population accessing healthcare has been infected by SARS-CoV-2 than is reflected by infection cases confirmed by molecular testing. Furthermore, local governments need to prioritize addressing the many forms of systemic racism and socioeconomic disadvantage that drive SARS-CoV-2 exposure risk, such as residential and occupational risk, and an urgent need to provide access to SARS-CoV-2 testing and vaccination to these groups.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was supported by funds from the NC Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Public Health (Contract 00041877) and the SeroNet program of the National Cancer Institute (1U01CA261277-01). Funding sources played no role in study design, in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, in the writing of the report, or in the decision to submit the paper for publication.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All data for this study were collected under UNC IRB #20-0791, which is conducted under Good Clinical Research Practices (GCP) and compliant with institutional IRB oversight. De-identified samples used for assay validation were collected under UNC IRBs #20-0913 and #08-0895.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData Sharing Deidentified individual data will be shared beginning 9 to 36 months following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/sharing agreement with UNC.