RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Emergence and spread of SARS-CoV-2 lineages B.1.1.7 and P.1 in Italy JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2021.03.24.21254277 DO 10.1101/2021.03.24.21254277 A1 Francesca Di Giallonardo A1 Ilaria Puglia A1 Valentina Curini A1 Cesare Cammà A1 Iolanda Mangone A1 Paolo Calistri A1 Joanna C.A. Cobbin A1 Edward C. Holmes A1 Alessio Lorusso YR 2021 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/28/2021.03.24.21254277.abstract AB Italy’s second wave of SARS-CoV-2 has hit hard, with more than 3 million cases and over 100,000 deaths, representing an almost ten-fold increase on the numbers reported by August 2020. Herein, we present the analysis of 6,515 SARS-CoV-2 sequences sampled in Italy between 29th January 2020 and 1st March 2021 and show how different lineages emerged multiple times independently despite lockdown restrictions. Virus lineage B.1.177 became the dominant variant in November 2020, when cases peaked at 40,000 a day, but since January 2021 this is being replaced by the B.1.1.7 ‘variant of concern’. In addition, we report a sudden increase in another documented variant of concern – lineage P.1 – from December 2020 onwards, most likely caused by a single introduction into Italy. We again highlight how international importations drive the emergence of new lineages and that genome sequencing should remain a top priority for ongoing surveillance in Italy.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementAL was funded by the Italian Ministry of Health IZS AM 08/19 Ricerca Corrente 2019, NGS e diagnostica molecolare in Sanita Animale: Fast D2 and IZSAM 05/20 Ricerca Corrente 2020 PanCO: epidemiologia e patogenesi dei coronavirus umani ed animali. ECH was funded by an Australian Research Council Australian Laureate Fellowship (FL17010002).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Only data freely available online was used in this study. An acknowledgement table for all authors and institutions providing the data can be found in the supplementary data. Thus, no additional patient consent and other ethical approval is needed.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData used in this study was obtained from the GISAID EpiCovTM database.