%0 Journal Article %A Leslie Dietz %A David A. Constant %A Mark Fretz %A Patrick F. Horve %A Andreas Olsen-Martinez %A Jason Stenson %A Andrew Wilkes %A Robert G. Martindale %A William B. Messer %A Kevin G. Van Den Wymelenberg %T Exploring Integrated Environmental Viral Surveillance of Indoor Environments: A comparison of surface and bioaerosol environmental sampling in hospital rooms with COVID-19 patients %D 2021 %R 10.1101/2021.03.26.21254416 %J medRxiv %P 2021.03.26.21254416 %X The outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has dramatically transformed policies and practices surrounding public health. One such shift is the expanded emphasis on environmental surveillance for pathogens. Environmental surveillance methods have primarily relied upon wastewater and indoor surface testing, and despite substantial evidence that SARS-CoV-2 commonly travels through space in aerosols, there has been limited indoor air surveillance. This study investigated the effectiveness of integrated surveillance including an active air sampler, surface swabs and passive settling plates to detect SARS-CoV-2 in hospital rooms with COVID-19 patients and compared detection efficacy among sampling methods. The AerosolSense active air sampler was found to detect SARS-CoV-2 in 53.8% of all samples collected compared to 12.1% detection by passive air sampling and 14.8% detection by surface swabs. Approximately 69% of sampled rooms (22/32) returned a positive environmental sample of any type. Among positive rooms, ~32% had only active air samples that returned positive, while ~27% and ~9% had only one or more surface swabs or passive settling plates that returned a positive respectively, and ~32% had more than one sample type that returned a positive result. This study demonstrates the potential for the AerosolSense to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA in real-world healthcare environments and suggests that integrated sampling that includes active air sampling is an important addition to environmental pathogen surveillance in support of public health.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFunding for this research was partially provided by Thermo Fisher Scientific under award number 4133V0 to the University of Oregon and partially via the OHSU Foundation.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The research described was determined to be IRB exempt and granted an IRB exemption. This work was reviewed by the OHSU Institutional Biosafety Committee and approved under PROTO202000016.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData and analysis scripts are available on GitHub (https://github.com/BioBE/AerosolSense-FieldTrials). https://github.com/BioBE/AerosolSense-FieldTrials %U https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2021/03/26/2021.03.26.21254416.full.pdf