TY - JOUR T1 - Association between the physical work environment and work functioning impairment while working from home under the COVID-19 pandemic in Japanese workers JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.03.23.21254207 SP - 2021.03.23.21254207 AU - Makoto Okawara AU - Tomohiro Ishimaru AU - Seiichiro Tateishi AU - Ayako Hino AU - Mayumi Tsuji AU - Kazunori Ikegami AU - Masako Nagata AU - Shinya Matsuda AU - Yoshihisa Fujino AU - for the CORoNaWork project Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/26/2021.03.23.21254207.abstract N2 - Objective This study examined the relationship between the physical work environment and work functioning impairment while working from home in the context of rapid changes associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods This cross-sectional study of internet monitors was conducted between December 22 and 26, 2020. Of a total of 33,302 participants, 5,760 who worked from home at least 1 day a month, excluding those who met the exclusion criteria, were included in the analysis. A binary subjective assessment of the physical work environment while working from home was used as an exposure factor. We examined 9 items related to the physical work environment, including level of illuminance and use of suitable desks and chairs, traditionally recommended for health and safety management when working at a desk. The number of non-conformities to 7 items was also used as an exposure factor. The presence of severe work functioning impairment was measured using the Work Functioning impairment Scale (WFun), a self-reported outcome measure of the degree of work functioning impairment. Odds ratios of severe work functioning impairment were estimated using mixed-effects logistic regression analysis with the prefecture of residence as a random effect.Results Multivariate analysis showed that the odds ratio of severe work functioning impairment was significantly higher among those who indicated “No” to all recommended items except for “I work at a desk/chair for office use.” The highest odds ratio of work functioning impairment was associated with a “No” response to “There is enough light to do my work” (aOR: 2.02, 95%CI: 1.73–2.35, p<0.01). Our results also suggest the presence of a dose-response relationship between the number of non-conformities to recommendations for work environments while working from home and work functioning impairment.Conclusions Our findings suggest that it is important for both companies and individual workers to create a work environment that prevents negative health outcomes and improves productivity while working from home.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by a research grant from the University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan; a general incorporated foundation (Anshin Zaidan) for the development of educational materials on mental health measures for managers at small-sized enterprises; Health, Labour and Welfare Sciences Research Grants: Comprehensive Research for Women's Healthcare (H30-josei-ippan-002) and Research for the establishment of an occupational health system in times of disaster (H30-roudou-ippan-007); consigned research foundation (the Collabo-health Study Group); and scholarship donations from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesDue to the nature of this research, the participants of this study did not agree to their data being shared publicly, and hence, supporting data is not available. ER -