RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Tools for measuring sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) indicators in humanitarian settings
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.03.23.21254101
DO 10.1101/2021.03.23.21254101
A1 Céline M. Goulart
A1 Amanda Giancola
A1 Humaira Nakhuda
A1 Anita Ampadu
A1 Amber Purewal
A1 Jean-Luc Kortenaar
A1 Diego G. Bassani
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/26/2021.03.23.21254101.abstract
AB Background Effective measurement of all health indicators and especially SRHR is difficult in humanitarian settings. Displacement and insecurity due to conflict, natural disasters, and epidemics place women and girls at higher risk of SRHR-related morbidity and mortality and reduce the coverage of essential SRHR services. This scoping review describes the measurement tools, methods, and indicators used to measure SRHR coverage and outcome indicators in humanitarian settings in the past 15 years and presents an accessible dashboard that can be used by governments, researchers and implementing organizations to identify available SRHR measurement tools.Methods Scientific articles published between January 2004 and May 2019 were identified using Embase, Medline, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Scopus, PAIS index as well as relevant non-peer-reviewed literature available through websites of humanitarian organizations. Publications including data from low- or middle-income countries (LMICs), focused on women and/or girls living in areas impacted by a humanitarian crisis, where data was collected within five years of the crisis were included. Indicators extracted from these publications were categorized according to validated SRHR indicators recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). Measurement tools, sampling and data collection methods, gap areas (geographical, topical and contextual), and indicators were catalogued for easy access in an interactive Tableau dashboard.Results Our search yielded 42,081 peer-reviewed publications and 2,569 non-peer-reviewed reports. After initial title and abstract screening, 385 publications met the inclusion criteria. SRHR indicators were categorized into nine domains: abortion, antenatal care, family planning, gender-based violence, HIV and sexually transmitted infections, maternal health, maternal mortality, menstrual and gynecological health, and obstetric care (delivery). A total of 65 tools and questionnaires measuring SRHR were identified, of which 25 were designed specifically for humanitarian settings.Discussion Although SRHR was measured in humanitarian settings, several gaps in measurement were identified. Abortion and gynaecological health were not consistently measured across included studies or validated WHO indicators. Toolkits and indicators identified in this review may be used to inform future SRHR data collection in humanitarian settings. However, identifying and/or developing innovative data collection methodologies should be a research priority, especially in light of the recent COVID-19 pandemic.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFunded by Global Affairs Canada and the Canadian Partnership for Women and Childrens HealthAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This is a scoping review, it is not a clinical trial, and did not need ethics approval. There was no primary data collection.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. https://public.tableau.com/profile/humairanakhuda#!/vizhome/SRHRGEWEScopingReviewStory_Final_Nov16/SRHRGEWEStory AbbreviationsACASIaudio computer-assisted self-interviews;ALNAPActive Learning Network for Accountability and Performance;ANCAntenatal Care;CanWaCHCanadian Partnership for Women and Children’s Health;DHSDemographic and Health Survey;FGM/CFemale Genital Mutilation/Cutting;FPFamily Planning;GBVGender-Based Violence;GEWEGender Equality and Women’s Empowerment;HIVHuman Immunodeficiency Virus;IAFMInteragency Field Manual;IAWGInter-Agency Working Group;ICRCInternational Committee of the Red Cross;IDPInternally Displaced Persons;IRCInternational Rescue Committee;LMICsLow- and Middle-Income Countries;MHMMenstrual Hygiene Management;MISPMinimum Initial Service Package;MMRMaternal Mortality Rate;MSFMédecins Sans Frontières;NGOsNon-Governmental Organizations;PNCPost-Natal Care;PRISMAPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews;SCISave the Children International;SDGsSustainable Development Goals;SRHRSexual and Reproductive Health and Rights;STIsSexually Transmitted Infections;SVRISexual Violence Research Initiatives;UNFPAUnited Nations Population Fund;UNHCRUnited Nations High Commission for Refugees;WHOWorld Health Organization;WRAWomen of Reproductive Age