PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Shelley N. Facente
AU  - Lauren A. Hunter
AU  - Laura J. Packel
AU  - Yi Li
AU  - Anna Harte
AU  - Guy Nicolette
AU  - Shana McDevitt
AU  - Maya Petersen
AU  - Arthur L. Reingold
TI  - Feasibility and effectiveness of daily temperature screening to detect COVID-19 in a large public university setting
AID  - 10.1101/2021.03.22.21254140
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.03.22.21254140
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/26/2021.03.22.21254140.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/26/2021.03.22.21254140.full
AB  - Background Many persons with active SARS-CoV-2 infection experience mild or no symptoms, presenting barriers to COVID-19 prevention. Regular temperature screening is nonetheless used in some settings, including University campuses, to reduce transmission potential. We evaluated the potential impact of this strategy using a prospective University-affiliated cohort.Methods Between June and August 2020, 2,912 participants were enrolled and tested for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR at least once (median: 3, range: 1-9). Participants reported temperature and symptoms daily via electronic survey using a previously owned or study-provided thermometer. We assessed feasibility and acceptability of daily temperature monitoring, calculated sensitivity and specificity of various fever-based strategies for restricting campus access to reduce transmission, and estimated the association between measured temperature and SARS-CoV-2 test positivity using a longitudinal binomial mixed model.Results Most participants (70.2%) did not initially have a thermometer for taking their temperature daily. Across 5481 total person months, the average daily completion rate of temperature values was 61.6% (IQR: 41.8%–86.2%). Sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2 ranged from 0% (95%CI 0–9.7%) to 40.5% (95%CI 25.6–56.7%) across all strategies for self-report of possible COVID-19 symptoms on day of specimen collection, with corresponding specificity of 99.9% (95%CI 99.8–100%) to 95.3% (95%CI 94.7–95.9%). An increase of 0.1°F in individual mean body temperature on the same day as specimen collection was associated with 1.11 increased odds of SARS-CoV-2 positivity (95%CI 1.06–1.17).Conclusions Daily temperature monitoring was feasible and acceptable; however, the majority of potentially infectious individuals were not detected by temperature monitoring, suggesting that temperature screening is insufficient as a primary means of detection to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementPrivate donations from University of California, Berkeley alumni and families of current students made this study possible.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This research was approved by the UC Berkeley Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects (CPHS), protocols #2020-06-13349 (essential workers), #2020-05-13261 (students), and #2020-04-13238 (faculty/staff).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesDe-identified data collected for this study, including individual participant data and a data dictionary defining each field in the set, will be made available to other researchers upon request. These data will be available beginning July 1, 2021 or upon publication of the final manuscript planned by key study staff, whichever comes first. Data can be accessed via email to the corresponding author, with a signed data access agreement and approval of a proposal by the study's Principal Investigators.