TY - JOUR T1 - Reduced critical care demand with early CPAP and proning in COVID-19 at Bradford: a single centre cohort JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.06.05.20123307 SP - 2020.06.05.20123307 AU - T Lawton AU - K Wilkinson AU - A Corp AU - R Javid AU - L MacNally AU - M McCooe AU - E Newton Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/24/2020.06.05.20123307.abstract N2 - Background Guidance in COVID-19 respiratory failure has favoured early intubation, with concerns over the use of CPAP. We adopted early CPAP and self-proning, and evaluated the safety and efficacy of this approach.Methods This retrospective observational study included all patients with a positive COVID-19 PCR, and others with high clinical suspicion. Our protocol advised early CPAP and self-proning for severe cases, aiming to prevent rather than respond to deterioration. CPAP was provided outside critical care by ward staff supported by physiotherapists and an intensive critical care outreach program. Data were analysed descriptively and compared against a large UK cohort (ISARIC).Results 559 patients admitted before 1/May/20 were included. 376 were discharged alive, and 183 died. 165 patients (29.5%) received CPAP, 40 (7.2%) were admitted to critical care and 28 (5.0%) were ventilated. Hospital mortality was 32.7%, and 50% for critical care. Following CPAP, 62% of patients with S:F or P:F ratios indicating moderate or severe ARDS, who were candidates for escalation, avoided intubation. Figures for critical care admission, intubation and hospital mortality are lower than ISARIC, whilst critical care mortality is similar. Following ISARIC proportions we would have admitted 92 patients to critical care and intubated 55. Using the described protocol, we intubated 28 patients from 40 admissions, and remained within our expanded critical care capacity.Conclusion Bradford’s protocol produced good results despite our population having high levels of co-morbidity and ethnicities associated with poor outcomes. In particular we avoided overloading critical care capacity. We advocate this approach as both effective and safe.Social media summary The use of early CPAP and proning in COVID-19 was associated with lower critical care admissions, intubation, and mortality at Bradford compared to a large UK cohort (ISARIC WHO CCP-UK).Competing Interest StatementTL is involved in the development of an open source CPAP device for use in low-income countries under an EPSRC grant (no funding received). RJ reports grants from Abbott Electro-physiology Research Fund, outside the submitted work. KW, AC, LM, MM, EN have nothing to disclose. Funding StatementNo fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:NHS Health Research Authority & Bradford Teaching Hospitals Director of ResearchAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. ER -