RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Epigenetic drift association with cancer risk and survival, and modification by sex
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.03.16.21253762
DO 10.1101/2021.03.16.21253762
A1 Yu, Chenglong
A1 Wong, Ee Ming
A1 Joo, Jihoon Eric
A1 Hodge, Allison M.
A1 Makalic, Enes
A1 Schmidt, Daniel
A1 Buchanan, Daniel D.
A1 Severi, Gianluca
A1 Hopper, John L.
A1 English, Dallas R.
A1 Giles, Graham G.
A1 Southey, Melissa C.
A1 Dugué, Pierre-Antoine
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/17/2021.03.16.21253762.abstract
AB To investigate age- and sex-specific DNA methylation alterations related to cancer risk and survival, we used matched case-control studies of colorectal (N=835), gastric (N=170), kidney (N=143), lung (N=332), prostate (N=869) and urothelial (N=428) cancers, and mature B-cell lymphoma (N=438). Linear mixed-effects models were conducted to identify age-, sex- and age-by-sex-associated methylation markers using a discovery (controls) - replication (cases) strategy. Replication was further examined using summary statistics from Generation Scotland (GS). Associations between replicated markers and risk of and survival from cancer were assessed using conditional logistic regression and Cox models (hazard ratios [HR]), respectively. We found 32,659, 23,141 and 48 CpGs with replicated associations for age, sex and age-by-sex, respectively. The replication rates (GS summary data) for these CpGs were 94%, 86% and 91%, respectively. Significant signals for cancer risk and survival were identified at some individual age-related CpGs. There was a strong negative trend in the association between epigenetic drift and risk of colorectal cancer. Two CpGs overlapping TMEM49 and ARX genes were associated with survival of overall (HR=0.91, P=7.7×10−4) and colorectal (HR=1.52, P=1.8×10−4) cancer, respectively, with significant age-by-sex interaction. Our results may provide markers for cancer early detection and prognosis prediction.Simple Summary Ageing is the strongest cancer risk factor, and men and women exhibit disparate risk profiles in terms of incidence and survival. DNA methylation is known to strongly vary by age and sex. Epigenetic drift refers to age-related DNA methylation changes and the tendency for increasing discordance between epigenomes over time, but it remains unknown to what extent the epigenetic drift might contribute to cancer risk and survival. The aims of this study were to identify age-associated, sex-associated and sexually dimorphic age-associated (age-by-sex-associated) DNA methylation markers and investigate whether age- and age-by-sex-associated markers are associated with cancer risk and survival. Our study, which used a total of 3,215 matched case-control pairs with DNA methylation in pre-diagnostic blood, is the first large study to examine the association between sex-specific epigenetic drift and cancer development and progression. The results may be useful for cancer early diagnosis and prediction of prognosis.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementMCCS cohort recruitment was funded by VicHealth and Cancer Council Victoria. The MCCS was further supported by Australian NHMRC grants 209057, 251553 and 504711 and by infrastruc-ture provided by Cancer Council Victoria. The nested case-control methylation studies were supported by the NHMRC grants 1011618, 1026892, 1027505, 1050198, 1043616 and 1074383. This work was further supported by NHMRC grant 1164455. M.C.S. is a recipient of a Senior Re-search Fellowship from the NHMRC (GTN1155163).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by Cancer Council Victoria's Human Research Ethics Committee, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. All participants provided informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.