PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Jeannot Dumaresq AU - François Coutlée AU - Philippe J. Dufresne AU - Jean Longtin AU - Judith Fafard AU - Julie Bestman-Smith AU - Marco Bergevin AU - Emilie Vallières AU - Marc Desforges AU - Annie-Claude Labbé TI - Natural spring water gargle and direct RT-PCR for the diagnosis of COVID-19 (COVID-SPRING study) AID - 10.1101/2021.03.11.21251938 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.03.11.21251938 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/12/2021.03.11.21251938.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/12/2021.03.11.21251938.full AB - We prospectively compared natural spring water gargle to combined oro-nasopharyngeal swab (ONPS) for the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in paired clinical specimens (1005 ONPS and 1005 gargles) collected from 987 unique early symptomatic as well as asymptomatic individuals from the community. Using a direct RT-PCR method with the Allplex™ 2019-nCoV Assay (Seegene), the clinical sensitivity of the gargle was 95.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90.2 to 98.3%) and was similar to the sensitivity of the ONPS (93.8%; 95% CI, 88.2 to 97.3%), despite significantly lower viral RNA concentration in gargles, as reflected by higher cycle threshold values. No single specimen type detected all COVID-19 cases. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was stable in gargles at room temperature for at least 7 days. The simplicity of this sampling method coupled with the accessibility of spring water are clear advantages in a pandemic situation where testing frequency, turnaround time and shortage of consumables and trained staff are critical elements.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was supported by the Ministere de la Sante et des Service sociaux de la province de Quebec (reagents and equipment) and the Centre integre de sante et de services sociaux de Chaudiere-Appalaches (human and technical resources).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This research was considered by our research ethics committee at CISSS de Chaudiere-Appalaches and deemed exempt in accordance with the Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans - TCPS 2 (2018). The research was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data analysed during this study are included in this published article and are available from the authors upon reasonable request.