PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Matthias Ott
AU  - Alexander Krohn
AU  - Laurence H. Bilfield
AU  - F. Dengler
AU  - C. Jaki
AU  - F. Echterdiek
AU  - T Schilling
AU  - J. Heymer
TI  - Leg-heel chest compression as an alternative for medical professionals in times of COVID-19
AID  - 10.1101/2021.03.09.21253220
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.03.09.21253220
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/12/2021.03.09.21253220.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/12/2021.03.09.21253220.full
AB  - Objective To evaluate leg-heel chest compression without previous training as an alternative for medical professionals and its effects on distance to potential aerosol spread during chest compression.Methods 20 medical professionals performed standard manual chest compression followed by leg-heel chest compression after a brief instruction on a manikin. We compared percentage of correct chest compression position, percentage of full chest recoil, percentage of correct compression depth, average compression depth, percentage of correct compression rate and average compression rate between both methods. In a second approach, potential aerosol spread during chest compression was visualized.Results There was no significant difference between manual and leg-heel compression. The distance to potential aerosol spread could have been increased by leg-heel method.Conclusion Under special circumstances like COVID-19-pandemic, leg-heel chest compression may be an effective alternative without previous training compared to manual chest compression while markedly increasing the distance to the patient.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external fundings have been received.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:There was no necessary IRB / ethics committee approvalAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.