PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Drew A. Westmoreland AU - Amanda Berry AU - Rebecca Zimba AU - Sarah Kulkarni AU - Angela Parcesepe AU - Andrew R Maroko AU - Emily Poehlein AU - William You AU - Chloe Mirzayi AU - Shivani Kochhar AU - McKaylee Robertson AU - Levi Waldron AU - Christian Grov AU - Denis Nash TI - Spread and sources of information and misinformation about COVID-19 early during the pandemic in a U.S. national cohort study AID - 10.1101/2021.03.10.21252851 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.03.10.21252851 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/12/2021.03.10.21252851.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/12/2021.03.10.21252851.full AB - Background Early in the pandemic, misinformation about COVID-19 was spread on social media. The purpose of this study was to describe trusted sources of COVID-19 information and claims seen and believed about COVID-19 early in the pandemic among U.S. adults. Then, we assessed the impact of believing such claims on engaging in personal protective actions (PPA).Methods We used baseline data from the CHASING COVID Cohort (n = 7,070) collected March 28, 2020 to April 20, 2020 to describe trusted sources of COVID-19 information as well as claims circulating on social media that had been seen and believed. We used Poisson regression to determine the association of believing certain claims with engaging in a higher number of PPA.Results The top three trusted sources of COVID-19 information were the CDC (67.9%), the WHO (53.7%), and State Health Departments (53.0%). Several COVID-19 claims circulated on social media had been seen, e.g., that the virus was created in a laboratory (54.8%). Moreover, substantial proportions of participants indicated agreement with some of these claims. In multivariable regression, we found that belief in certain claims was associated with engaging in a higher number of PPA. For example, believing that paper masks would prevent transmission of the virus was associated with engaging in a higher number of protective actions (β = 0.02, 95% CI: 0.004 – 0.046).Conclusions Results suggest the need for public health leadership on social media platforms to combat misinformation and supports social media as a tool to further public health interventions.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialThis is not an intervention study.Clinical Protocols https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.28.20080630v2#p-5 Funding StatementFunding for this project is provided by the CUNY Institute for Implementation Science in Population Health (cunyisph.org), the COVID-19 Grant Program of the CUNY Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, and the National Institute Of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number UH3AI133675. The NIH played no role in the production of this manuscript nor necessarily endorses the findings.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the City University of New York (CUNY) Graduate School for Public Health and Health Policy.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesDe-identified data may be made available upon request.