RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Comparative Study of Therapeutic Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of BNO 1030 application in the technology of delayed prescription of antibiotics in patients with severe acute tonsillitis
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.03.10.21253255
DO 10.1101/2021.03.10.21253255
A1 V. I. Popovych
A1 I. V. Koshel
A1 O. N. Malofiichuk
A1 L. I. Pyletska
A1 O. A. Semeniuk
A1 O. V. Martynnyk
A1 R. N. Orlovska
A1 O. I. Leta
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/12/2021.03.10.21253255.abstract
AB Acute bacterial tonsillitis occurs in 20 –30 % of immunocompetent children; however, the frequency of antibacterial drug prescriptions reaches up to 90 %. Delayed antibiotic prescription is recommended by current guidelines. The study objective was to determine the efficacy of phytoneering extract BNO 1030 in the technology of delayed antibiotic prescription in patients with severe acute tonsillitis.Methods In the multicenter, randomized, open-label, comparative study, 182 out of 200 randomized children with acute tonsillitis aged 6 –12 years completed the study. Evaluation criteria: a reduced severity of sore throat when swallowing and at rest, throat irritation at rest, hyperemia of the tonsils assessed by a physician according to a 4-point scale at each visit compared to Visit 1, dynamics of self-assessment of general well-being, intensity of sore throat and difficulty swallowing according to a 10-point visual analogue scale, frequency of antibiotic prescriptions, therapeutic benefit from BNO 1030 in days.Results The use of phytotherapeutic medicinal product BNO 1030 in addition to the standard symptomatic treatment of severe acute tonsillitis provides a clinically significant, adequate reduction in the symptom severity assessed by a physician at V2 (p < 0.005). There are significant differences in the patient’s self-assessment of the symptoms from treatment Day 2 (p < 0.005). This allows to significantly reduce the duration of systemic antipyretic administration (p < 0.005). In the first days of treatment, when a decision on delay of antibiotic prescription is made, a therapeutic benefit in two days in patients of the treatment group was observed compared to the control group. The use of BNO 1030 in patients with severe acute tonsillitis significantly reduces, by 43.7 % or 2.3 times, the need for prescribing antibiotic therapy as part of the technology of delayed antibiotic prescription (p < 0.005). During treatment, no side effects and complications of the disease were recorded.Conclusion BNO 1030 is a safe and effective medicinal product for the treatment of severe acute tonsillitis in children aged 6 –12 years. It provides a significant therapeutic benefit when administered in addition to standard symptomatic therapy and reduces the irrational antibiotic prescription.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04537819 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04537819?term=ATi-2&draw=2&rank=1Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNCT04537819Clinical Protocols https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04537819?term=ATi-2&draw=2&rank=1 Funding StatementThis Investigator Initiated Trial was funded by BionoricaAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The ethical committee of Ivano-Frankivsk National Medical UniversityAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll the data can be provided by the corresponding author. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04537819?term=ATi-2&draw=2&rank=1