RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Higher COVID-19 vaccination rates are linked to decreased county-level COVID-19 incidence across USA
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.03.05.21252946
DO 10.1101/2021.03.05.21252946
A1 Arjun Puranik
A1 AJ Venkatakrishnan
A1 Colin Pawlowski
A1 Bharathwaj Raghunathan
A1 Eshwan Ramudu
A1 Patrick Lenehan
A1 Vineet Agarwal
A1 Savita Jayaram
A1 Mayank Choudhary
A1 Venky Soundararajan
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/08/2021.03.05.21252946.abstract
AB Real world evidence studies of mass vaccination across health systems have reaffirmed the safety1 and efficacy2,3 of the FDA-authorized mRNA vaccines for COVID-19. However, the impact of vaccination on community transmission remains to be characterized. Here, we compare the cumulative county-level vaccination rates with the corresponding COVID-19 incidence rates among 87 million individuals from 580 counties in the United States, including 12 million individuals who have received at least one vaccine dose. We find that cumulative county-level vaccination rate through March 1, 2021 is significantly associated with a concomitant decline in COVID-19 incidence (Spearman correlation ρ = −0.22, p-value = 8.3e-8), with stronger negative correlations in the Midwestern counties (ρ = −0.37, p-value = 1.3e-7) and Southern counties (ρ = −0.33, p-value = 4.5e-5) studied. Additionally, all examined US regions demonstrate significant negative correlations between cumulative COVID-19 incidence rate prior to the vaccine rollout and the decline in the COVID-19 incidence rate between December 1, 2020 and March 1, 2021, with the US western region being particularly striking (ρ = −0.66, p-value = 5.3e-37). However, the cumulative vaccination rate and cumulative incidence rate are noted to be statistically independent variables, emphasizing the need to continue the ongoing vaccination roll out at scale. Given confounders such as different coronavirus restrictions and mask mandates, varying population densities, and distinct levels of diagnostic testing and vaccine availabilities across US counties, we are advancing a public health resource to amplify transparency in vaccine efficacy monitoring (https://public.nferx.com/covid-monitor-lab/vaccinationcheck). Application of this resource highlights outliers like Dimmit county (Texas), where infection rates have increased significantly despite higher vaccination rates, ostensibly owing to amplified travel as a “vaccination hub”; as well as Henry county (Ohio) which encountered shipping delays leading to postponement of the vaccine clinics. This study underscores the importance of tying the ongoing vaccine rollout to a real-time monitor of spatio-temporal vaccine efficacy to help turn the tide of the COVID-19 pandemic.Competing Interest StatementAP, AJV, CP, BR, ER, PL, VA, SJ, MC, and VS are employees of nference and have financial interests in the company.Funding StatementThe research was self-funded by nferenceAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All data analyzed was publicly available from the CDC COVID Data Tracker, and so no IRB was required (https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#datatracker-home)All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAfter publication, the data will be made available to others upon reasonable requests to the corresponding author (venky{at}nference.net). A proposal with a detailed description of study objectives and the statistical analysis plan will be needed for evaluation of the reasonability of requests.