TY - JOUR T1 - Redesigning SARS-CoV-2 clinical RT-qPCR assays for wastewater RT-ddPCR JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.03.02.21252754 SP - 2021.03.02.21252754 AU - Raul Gonzalez AU - Allison Larson AU - Hannah Thompson AU - Errin Carter AU - Xavier Fernandez Cassi Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/05/2021.03.02.21252754.abstract N2 - COVID-19 wastewater surveillance has gained widespread acceptance to monitor community infection trends. Wastewater samples primarily differ from clinical samples by having low viral concentrations due to dilution, and high levels of PCR inhibitors. Therefore, wastewater samples should have appropriately designed and optimized molecular assays. Digital PCR has proven to be more sensitive and resilient to matrix inhibition. However, most SARS-CoV-2 assays being used have been designed for clinical use on RT-qPCR instruments, then adopted to digital PCR platforms. But it is unknown whether clinical RT-qPCR assays are adequate to use on digital PCR platforms. Here we designed an N- and E- gene multiplex (ddCoV_N and ddCoV_E) specifically for RT-ddPCR and benchmarked them against the nCoV_N2 and E_Sarbeco assays. ddCoV_N and ddCoV_E have equivalent limits of detections and samples concentrations to NCoV_N2 and E_Sarbeco but showed improved signal-to-noise ratios that eased interpretation and ability to multiplex. From GISAID downloaded unique sequences analyzed, 2.12% and 0.83% present a mismatch or would not be detected by the used primer/probe combination for the ddCoV_N and ddCoV_E, respectively.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding was received.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study is exempt from needing IRB approval. All samples are environmental.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesRaw data is available upon request. ER -