PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Williams, Lynn
AU  - MacDonald, Bradley
AU  - Rollins, Lesley
AU  - Janssen, Xanne
AU  - Fleming, Leanne
AU  - Grealy, Madeleine
AU  - Kirk, Alison
AU  - Young, David
AU  - Flowers, Paul
TI  - Sharing positive changes made during COVID-19 national lockdown: a multi-method co-production study
AID  - 10.1101/2021.03.03.21252809
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.03.03.21252809
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/05/2021.03.03.21252809.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/05/2021.03.03.21252809.full
AB  - Objective A multi-method co-production study was designed to share psychosocial insights into the adoption of positive changes made during COVID-19 national lockdown in Scotland. We examined: i) the psychosocial patterning of positive changes, ii) the psychosocial processes by which positive change was realised, and worked with partner organizations to share our insights.Methods A sequential multi-method design included an online survey (n=2445) assessing positive changes in sleep and physical activity patterns, socio-demographics, mood, social support, coping, and resilience, with multivariate logistic regression analysis. We also employed interviews with a purposive diverse sub-sample of people self-reporting high levels of positive change (n=48) and used thematic analysis. Finally, partnership work translated insights into positive change-sharing targeted resources.Results The survey identified positive change was significantly patterned by age, gender and vulnerability to COVID-19. Higher positive reframing and higher active coping were associated with higher levels of cross-domain positive change. Higher symptoms of depression, planning, and self-distraction were associated with less cross-domain positive change. Thematic analysis showed the centrality of perceptions of time, opportunities to self-reflect and engage with the natural world, access support in diverse ways, actively build routine and purposefully build self-efficacy and a sense of control were key to initiating positive change. Our partner organizations focused on the rapid co-production of a series of online resources that shared study insights.Conclusions Our study, based around a salutogenic ethos and the constraints of COVID-19, sought to identify and share insights into achieving positive changes at a time of international crisis.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research was funded by the Chief Scientist Office in Scotland (Ref COV/SCL/20/09).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The University of Strathclyde Research Ethics CommitteeAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData are not publicly available due to ethical or privacy restrictions