PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Noreen Bukhari-Parlakturk AU - Michael Lutz AU - Alec McConnell AU - Hussein Al-Khalidi AU - Joyce En-Hua Wang AU - Burton Scott AU - Pichet Termsarasab AU - Lawrence Appelbaum AU - Nicole Calakos TI - Designing research studies in writer’s cramp dystonia: an analysis of automated writing measures AID - 10.1101/2021.03.02.21252036 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.03.02.21252036 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/04/2021.03.02.21252036.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/04/2021.03.02.21252036.full AB - Background Writer’s cramp (WC) dystonia presents with abnormal postures during the task of writing and is an ideal dystonia subtype to study disease mechanisms for all forms of focal dystonia. Development of novel therapies is contingent on identifying sensitive and specific measures that can relate to the clinical syndrome and achieve a realistic sample size to power clinical research study for a rare disease. Although there have been prior studies employing automated measures of writing kinematics, it remains unclear which measures can distinguish WC subjects with high sensitivity and specificity and how these measures relate to clinician rating scales and patient-reported disability. The goal of this study was to: 1-identify automated writing measures that distinguish WC from healthy subjects, 2-measure sensitivity and specificity of these automated measures as well as their association with established dystonia rating scales, and 3-determine the sample size needed for each automated measure to power a clinical research study.Methods 21 WC dystonia and 22 healthy subjects performed a sentence-copying assessment on a digital tablet in a kinematic software and hand recognition software. The sensitivity and specificity of automated measures was calculated using a logistic regression model. Measures were then correlated with examiner and patient rating scales. Power analysis was performed for 2 clinical research designs using these automated measures.Results Of the 23 automated writing measures analyzed, only 3 measures showed promise for use in a clinical research study. The automated measures of writing legibility, duration, and peak acceleration were able to distinguish WC from healthy controls with high sensitivity and specificity, correlated with examiner-rated dystonia sub-score measures and demonstrated relatively smaller sample sizes suitable for research studies in a rare disease population.Discussion We identified novel automated writing outcome measures for use in clinical research studies of WC subjects which capture key aspects of the clinical disease and can serve as important readout of dystonia disease mechanism as well as future disease interventions.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research study was supported by NCATS (1KL2TR002554), Clinical Fellowship Training Program from Dystonia Medical Research Foundation, and Fund to Retain Clinician Scientists from Doris Duke Charitable Foundation to NBP. Research was also supported by NCATS (UL1TR002553) to AM and HK.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Duke Health Institutional Review BoardAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData is available upon request from the primary author.