TY - JOUR T1 - Relation of severe COVID-19 in Scotland to transmission-related factors and risk conditions eligible for shielding support: REACT-SCOT case-control study JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.03.02.21252734 SP - 2021.03.02.21252734 AU - Paul M McKeigue AU - David A McAllister AU - David Caldwell AU - Ciara Gribben AU - Jen Bishop AU - Stuart McGurnaghan AU - Matthew Armstrong AU - Joke Delvaux AU - Sam Colville AU - Sharon Hutchinson AU - Chris Robertson AU - Nazir Lone AU - Jim McMenamin AU - David Goldberg AU - Helen M Colhoun Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/03/2021.03.02.21252734.abstract N2 - Objectives To investigate:(1) the risk of severe COVID-19 in those eligible for shielding, and (2) the relation of severe COVID-19 to transmission-related factors in those in shielding and the general population.Design Matched case-control study (REACT-SCOT).Setting Population of Scotland from 1 March 2020 to 28 January 2021.Participants All 160307 diagnosed cases of COVID-19 and 1564782 controls matched for age, sex and primary care practice, linked with all 204913 individuals identified as eligible for shielding by Public Health Scotland.Main outcome measure Severe COVID-19, defined as cases that entered critical care or were fatal.Results With those without risk conditions as reference category, the univariate rate ratio for severe COVID-19 was 5.3 (95% CI 5.0 to 5.7, p=4 × 10−527) in those with moderate risk conditions and 7.6 (95% CI 7.1 to 8.3, p=1 × 10−527) in those eligible for shielding. The highest rate was in solid organ transplant recipients: rate ratio 13.6 (95% CI 9.6 to 19.2, p=8 × 10−50). In both the shielded and the general population, the risk of severe COVID-19 increased with the number of adults but decreased with the number of school-age children in the household. Severe COVID-19 was strongly associated with recent exposure to hospital (defined as 5 to 14 days before presentation date): rate ratio 12.6 (95% CI 11.7 to 13.6, p=2 × 10−989) overall. In a case-crossover analysis with less recent exposure only (15 to 24 days before first testing positive) as reference category, the rate ratio associated with recent exposure only was 6.3 (95% CI 3.6 to 11.1, p=2 × 10−10). Among those eligible for shielding, the population attributable risk fraction (PARF) of severe cases for recent exposure to hospital was 36%. In the general population the PARF for recent exposure to hospital peaked at 46% in May 2020 and again at 64% in December 2020.Conclusions The effectiveness of shielding vulnerable individuals was limited by the inability to control transmission in hospital and from other adults in the household. For solid organ transplant recipients, in whom the efficacy of vaccines is uncertain, these results support a policy of offering vaccination to household contacts. Mitigating the impact of the epidemic requires control of nosocomial transmission.What is already known on this topic?Individuals designated as “clinically extremely vulnerable” – about 3% of the population – have been advised to shield themselves during the COVID-19 epidemicThe effectiveness of this shielding programme has not been evaluated.What this study addsHospital-acquired infection has made a substantial contribution to the burden of COVID-19 in the population, accounting for more than half of severe cases in early December 2020.For vulnerable individuals to be shielded, the risk of hospital-acquired infection must be reduced and support must be provided for other adults in the household to co-isolate with the vulnerable individual.Solid organ transplant recipients are at the highest risk; vaccination of household contacts should be considered for this group.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialThe original protocol for the REACT-SCOT case-control study was registered with the European Network of Centres for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance (ENCEPP number EUPAS35558).Funding StatementNo specific funding was received for this study.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Public Benefit and Privacy Panel for Health and Social CareAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe component datasets used here are available via the Public Benefits Privacy Panel for Health at https://www.informationgovernance.scot.nhs.uk/pbpphsc/ for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data. All source code used for derivation of variables, statistical analysis and generation of this manuscript is available on https://github.com/pmckeigue/covid-scotland_public ER -