RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Unwelcome memento mori or best clinical practice? Community end-of-life anticipatory medication prescribing practice: a mixed methods observational study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.02.25.21252474
DO 10.1101/2021.02.25.21252474
A1 Ben Bowers
A1 Kristian Pollock
A1 Stephen Barclay
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/03/01/2021.02.25.21252474.abstract
AB Background Anticipatory medications are injectable drugs prescribed ahead of possible need for administration if distressing symptoms arise in the final days of life. Little is known about how they are prescribed in primary care.Aim To investigate the frequency, timing and recorded circumstances of anticipatory medications prescribing for patients living at home and in residential care.Design Retrospective mixed methods observational study using General Practitioner and community nursing clinical records.Setting/participants 329 deceased adult patients registered with Eleven General Practitioner practices and two associated community nursing services in Hertfordshire and Cambridgeshire, England (30 most recent deaths per practice). Patients died from any cause except trauma, sudden death or suicide, between 4 March 2017 and 25 September 2019.Results Anticipatory medications were prescribed for 167/329 (50.8%) of the deceased patients, between 0 and 1212 days before death (median 17 days). The likelihood of prescribing was significantly higher for patients with a recorded preferred place of death (odds ratio [OR] 34; 95% CI 15-77; p < 0.001) and specialist palliative care involvement (OR 7; 95% CI 3-19; p < 0.001). For 66.5% of patients (111/167) anticipatory medications were recorded as being prescribed as part of a single end of-life planning intervention.Conclusion The variability in the timing of prescriptions highlights the challenges in diagnosing the end-of-life phase and the potential risks of prescribing far in advance of possible need. Patient and family preferences for involvement in anticipatory medications prescribing decision-making and their experiences of care warrant urgent investigation.What is already known on this topicWhat is already known on this topicThe prescribing of injectable anticipatory medications to provide symptom relief in the last days of life care is recommended and widespread practice in a number of counties.There is limited research concerning the frequency, timing and context of prescriptions.What this paper addsWhat this paper addsHalf (50.8%) of 319 patients whose deaths were potentially predictable deaths were prescribed anticipatory medications, the timing of prescriptions ranging from 0 to 1212 days before death (median 17 days).Anticipatory medications were frequently prescribed as standardised drugs and doses, and often as part of a single end-of-life care planning intervention.The extent to which patients and family carers were involved in prescribing decisions was unclear.Implications for practice, theory or policyImplications for practice, theory or policyPatient and family preferences for involvement in anticipatory medications prescribing decision-making and their experiences of care warrant urgent investigation.The presence of anticipatory medications for long periods of time may compromise patient safety unless robust systems are in place to review their continued appropriateness and safe use.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementBB is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) School for Primary Care Research. SB is funded by the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration East of England (ARC EoE) programme. This work was also supported by the RCN Foundation Professional Bursary Scheme [grant number 20181113]Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The South Cambridgeshire Research Ethics Committee granted ethics approval [Reference: 19/EE/0012]. The Health Research Authority Confidentiality Advisory Group [19/CAG/0014] approved the processing of confidential patient information without consent in the public interest: data were anonymised at the earliest opportunity.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData sharing: The anonymised prescribing quantitative data used in this study may be requested by researchers on completion of a data use agreement.