PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Reine Zbeidy AU - Joshua Livingstone AU - Vadim Shatz AU - Yehuda Raveh AU - Rofayda Gad AU - Ramona Nicolau-Raducu AU - Fouad G. Souki TI - Survey of Contaminated Percutaneous Injuries in Anesthesia Practitioners AID - 10.1101/2021.01.21.21249920 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.01.21.21249920 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/28/2021.01.21.21249920.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/28/2021.01.21.21249920.full AB - Background Anesthesia practitioners are at inherent risk for percutaneous injuries by blood-contaminated needles and sharp objects. These exposures may result in transmission of HIV and hepatitis viruses. Data about this occupational hazard from contaminated needles and sharp devices is limited and decades old. We conducted a web-based survey to assess the occurrence, reporting, characteristics, and outcome of contaminated percutaneous injuries (CPI) in anesthesia residents, fellows, and attendings.Methods After institutional research board approval, an email was sent to 217 anesthesia practitioners requesting their participation in an online survey about contaminated percutaneous injuries. Responses were collected from February through March 2020. Results are reported as absolute numbers and proportions with 95% confidence interval (CI).Results The overall survey response rate was 51% (110/217). 59% (65/110) (95% CI, 50–68) of participants reported having one or more contaminated percutaneous injury during their years of anesthesia practice (42% (21/50) of residents, 50% (4/8) of fellows, 77% (40/52) of anesthesia attendings). Prevalence of injuries related to attendings’ years of anesthesia practice was 69% (95% CI, 44–94) for 5-10 years, 62.5% (95% CI, 29–96) for 10-15 years, and 79% (95% CI, 63– 95) for greater than 15 years of practice.35% (95% CI, 26–44) of participants reported having one or more CPI within the last 5 years (40% of residents, 50% of fellows, 29% of attendings). Occurrence of CPI within the last 5 years based on attending anesthesiologist years of practice was 57% for less than 5 years, 37.5% for 10-15 years, and 20% for 15-20 years of practice. 75% (95% CI, 65–85) reported the incident at the time of injury. 59% (95% CI, 48–70) of injuries were due to hollow bore needles. 50% (95% CI, 39–61) of total injuries were high risk. 26% of injured anesthesia practitioners received post-exposure prophylaxis and there were zero seroconversions.Conclusion Most anesthesiologists will sustain a contaminated percutaneous injury during their careers. Incidence of these injuries decreases with years of practice. Occurrence of these injuries is high among anesthesia residents, with the majority reporting their injuries. Half of the injuries are high risk with a quarter requiring postexposure prophylaxis. More education and interventions are needed to reduce percutaneous injuries and improve reporting.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo funding was received.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Human Subject Research office University of Miami IRB ID: 20200559 The IRB determined this study meets the criteria for an exemption as described in Federal Regulation 45 CFR 46.104.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll the data is included in the manuscript.