PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - P. Voruz
AU  - G. Allali
AU  - L. Benzakour
AU  - A. Nuber-Champier
AU  - M. Thomasson
AU  - I. Jacot
AU  - J. Pierce
AU  - P. Lalive
AU  - K-O. Lövblad
AU  - O. Braillard
AU  - M. Coen
AU  - J. Serratrice
AU  - J. Pugin
AU  - R. Ptak
AU  - I. Guessous
AU  - B.N. Landis
AU  - F. Assal
AU  - J.A. Péron
TI  - Long COVID neuropsychological deficits after severe, moderate or mild infection
AID  - 10.1101/2021.02.24.21252329
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.02.24.21252329
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/26/2021.02.24.21252329.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/26/2021.02.24.21252329.full
AB  - Background There is growing awareness that severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection can include long-term neuropsychological deficits, even in its mild or moderate respiratory forms.Methods Standardized neuropsychological, psychiatric, neurological and olfactory tests were administered to 45 patients (categorized according to the severity of their respiratory symptoms during the acute phase) 236.51 ± 22.54 days post-discharge following SARS-CoV-2 infection.Results Deficits were found in all the domains of cognition and the prevalence of psychiatric symptoms was also high in the three groups. The severe performed more poorly on long-term episodic memory and exhibited greater anosognosia. The moderate had poorer emotion recognition, which was positively correlated with persistent olfactory dysfunction. The mild were more stressed, anxious and depressed.Conclusion The data support the hypothesis that the virus targets the central nervous system (and notably the limbic system), and support the notion of different neuropsychological phenotypes.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe present research was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) within the framework of the COVID-19 National Research Program (NRP 78; grant no. 407840_198438, RNP 78) to JAP (PI) and FA (Co-PI). The funders had no role in data collection, discussion of content, preparation of the manuscript, or decision to publish. We would like to thank the patients for contributing their time to this study.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:After being given a complete description of the study, participants provided their written informed consent. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the study protocol was approved by the cantonal ethics committee of Geneva (CER-02186).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData will be avaible on Yareta (University of Geneva). The repository is under progress.