PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Xiang Zhang
AU  - Marissa Sumathipala
AU  - Marinka Zitnik
TI  - Population-scale patient safety data reveal inequalities in adverse events before and during COVID-19 pandemic
AID  - 10.1101/2021.01.17.21249988
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.01.17.21249988
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/26/2021.01.17.21249988.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/26/2021.01.17.21249988.full
AB  - Adverse patient safety events were associated with 110 thousand deaths in the U.S. alone in 2019. The COVID-19 pandemic has further challenged the ability of healthcare systems to ensure safe medication use, and its effects on patient safety remain unknown. Here, we investigate negative outcomes associated with medication use before and during the pandemic. Using a dataset of 10,443,476 reports involving 3,624 drugs and 19,193 adverse events, we develop an algorithmic approach to analyze the pandemic’s impact on the incidence of drug safety events by evaluating disproportional reporting relative to the pre-pandemic time, quantifying unexpected trends in clinical outcomes, and adjusting for drug interference. Among 64 adverse events identified by our analyses, we find 54 have increased incidence rates during the pandemic, even though adverse event reporting decreased by 4.4% overall. We find clinically relevant differences in drug safety outcomes between demographic groups. Compared to male patients, women report 47.0% more distinct adverse events whose occurrence significantly increased during the pandemic relative to pre-pandemic levels. Out of 53 adverse events with a pre-pandemic gender gap, 33 have an increased gender gap during the pandemic. While musculoskeletal and metabolic side effects are disproportionately enriched in women during the pandemic, immune-related adverse events are enriched only in men. We also find the number of adverse events with an increased reporting ratio is higher in adults (by 16.8%) than in older patients (adjusted for population size). Our findings have implications for safe medication use and tie the variation in adverse events to patients that may be disproportionately affected by preventable inequities during a public health emergency.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementClaimed in Acknowledgements.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The data used in this work are from FDA FAERS. The IRB is not required.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data used in the paper, including the raw and processed adverse event report dataset, adverse event ontology, drug ontology, the final and intermediate results of the analyses will be shared with research community via https://zitniklab.hms.harvard.eduuponpublication. https://github.com/mims-harvard/patient-safety