PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Erbesato, Monica AU - Mourad, Firas AU - Brindisino, Fabrizio AU - Salomon, Mattia AU - Rossettini, Giacomo AU - Margelli, Michele AU - Barbari, Valerio AU - Storari, Lorenzo AU - Andreoletti, Federico AU - Disarò, Jacopo AU - Maselli, Filippo TI - Specific Thoracic Pain: Red flag screening pathway for Physiotherapists. A Systematic Review AID - 10.1101/2021.02.23.21250954 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.02.23.21250954 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/25/2021.02.23.21250954.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/25/2021.02.23.21250954.full AB - The lifetime prevalence of isolated pain in the thoracic spine is relatively low, approximately 13-17%, compared to neck and low back pain, 40% and 57% respectively. However a patient with thoracic or chest pain is more likely to mask a serious pathology, such as spinal fracture, spinal tumor or metastasis, myocardial ischemia, pneumonia, etc.. A physical therapist is a primary healthcare professional and it is his responsibility to screen and identify serious pathologies outside the scope of practice. That is, differential diagnosis may help in excluding medical pain sources and, most importantly, recognize emergencys scenarios. An in-depth subjective and objective examination are the two pillars for the clinical evaluation that may help clinicians to determine if the pain is of musculoskeletal origin or not. In the literature, there is a lack of knowledge about the red flags (i.e. warning symptoms and signs) that can be useful for the screening for referral, not medical diagnosis, in the thoracic and chest wall pain. The aim of our systematic review is to investigate which findings form the subjective (symptoms and red flags) and objective examination (signs and tests) are valid tools for the differential diagnosis for thoracic pain or chest pain suspected to be caused by a serious pathology.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementnoneAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:-All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data results will be published.