TY - JOUR T1 - Self-testing for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection with rapid antigen tests JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.02.21.21252153 SP - 2021.02.21.21252153 AU - J. J.J.M. Stohr AU - V. F. Zwart AU - G. Goderski AU - A. Meijer AU - C. R.S. Nagel-Imming AU - M.F.Q. Kluytmans-van den Bergh AU - S. D. Pas AU - F. van den Oetelaar AU - M. Hellwich AU - K. H. Gan AU - A. Rietveld AU - J.J. Verweij AU - J. L. Murk AU - W. van den Bijllaardt AU - J. A. J. W. Kluytmans Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/23/2021.02.21.21252153.abstract N2 - Introduction Self-testing for COVID-19 infection with lateral flow assay SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen detection tests (RDT), provides rapid results and could enable frequent and extensive testing in the community, thereby improving the control of SARS-CoV-2. The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of self-testing using RDT without assistance.Methods Participants visiting a municipal SARS-CoV-2 testing centre, received self-testing kits containing either the BD Veritor System (BD RDT) or Roche SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection test (Roche RDT). Oro-nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from the participants for qRT-PCR testing. As a proxy for contagiousness, viral culture was performed on a selection of qRT-PCR positive samples to determine the Ct-value at which the chance of a positive culture was dropping below 0.5 (Ct-value cut-off). Sensitivity and specificity of self-testing were compared to qRT-PCR with a Ct-value below the Ct value cut-off. Determinants independently associated with a false-negative self-test result were determined.Results A total of 3,215 participants were included (BD RDT n=1604; Roche RDT n=1611). Sensitivity and specificity of self-testing compared to the qRT-PCR results with Ct-value below the Ct-value cut-off was 78.0% (95% CI:72.5-82.8) and 99.4% (95%CI: 99.0-99.6) respectively. Determinants independently associated with a false-negative self-testing results were: higher age, low viral load and finding self-testing difficult.Discussion Self-testing using currently available RDT’s has a high specificity and relatively high sensitivity to identify individuals with a high probability of contagiousness. The performance of two tests were comparable. This application has the potential for frequent and extensive testing which may be an aid to lift restrictions to society while controlling the spread of SARS-CoV-2.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research was funded by the Dutch ministry of health, welfare and sports (VWS).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study protocol was reviewed by the Dutch Medical research Ethics Committees United (MEC-U). The study was judged to be beyond the scope of the Dutch medical scientific research act (WMO).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data has been included in the manuscript ER -