TY - JOUR T1 - Forecasting COVID-19 cases: A comparative analysis between Recurrent and Convolutional Neural Networks JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.11.28.20240259 SP - 2020.11.28.20240259 AU - Khondoker Nazmoon Nabi AU - Md Toki Tahmid AU - Abdur Rafi AU - Muhammad Ehsanul Kader AU - Md. Asif Haider Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/20/2020.11.28.20240259.abstract N2 - When the entire world is waiting restlessly for a safe and effective COVID-19 vaccine that could soon become a reality, numerous countries around the globe are grappling with unprecedented surges of new COVID-19 cases. As the number of new cases is skyrocketing, pandemic fatigue and public apathy towards different intervention strategies are posing new challenges to the government officials to combat the pandemic. Henceforth, it is indispensable for the government officials to understand the future dynamics of COVID-19 flawlessly in order to develop strategic preparedness and resilient response planning. In light of the above circumstances, probable future outbreak scenarios in Brazil, Russia and the United kingdom have been sketched in this study with the help of four deep learning models: long short term memory (LSTM), gated recurrent unit (GRU), convolutional neural network (CNN) and multivariate convolutional neural network (MCNN). In our analysis, CNN algorithm has outperformed other deep learning models in terms of validation accuracy and forecasting consistency. It has been unearthed in our study that CNN can provide robust long term forecasting results in time series analysis due to its capability of essential features learning, distortion invariance and temporal dependence learning. However, the prediction accuracy of LSTM algorithm has been found to be poor as it tries to discover seasonality and periodic intervals from any time series dataset, which were absent in our studied countries. Our study has highlighted the promising validation of using convolutional neural networks instead of recurrent neural networks when it comes to forecasting with very few features and less amount of historical data.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNot neededFunding StatementNo funding has been received for conducting this studyAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Not requiredAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll datasets are available online ER -