RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Lesion Symptom Mapping of Domain-Specific Cognitive Impairments using Routine Imaging in Stroke
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.02.17.21251846
DO 10.1101/2021.02.17.21251846
A1 Margaret Jane Moore
A1 Nele Demeyere
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/19/2021.02.17.21251846.abstract
AB Background and Purpose This large-scale lesion-symptom mapping study aimed to investigate the necessary neuro-anatomical substrates of 5 cognitive domains frequently affected post stroke: Language, Attention, Praxis, Number, and Memory. This study aims to demonstrate the validity of using routine clinical brain imaging from a large, real-world patient cohort for lesion-symptom mapping.Methods Behavioural cognitive screening data from the Oxford Cognitive Screen and routine clinical neuroimaging from 573 acute patients was used in voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping analyses. Patients were classed as impaired or not on each of the subtests within 5 cognitive domains.Results Distinct patterns of lesion damage were associated with different domains. Language functions were associated with damage to left hemisphere fronto-temporal areas. Visuo-spatial functions were associated with damage to posterior occipital areas (Visual Field) and the right temporo-parietal region (Visual Neglect). Different memory impairments were linked to distinct voxel clusters within the left insular and opercular cortices. Deficits which were not associated with localised voxels (e.g. praxis, executive function) represent distributed functions.Conclusion The standardised, brief Oxford Cognitive Screen was able to reliably differentiate distinct neural correlates critically involved in supporting domain-specific cognitive abilities. By demonstrating and replicating known brain anatomy correlates within real-life clinical cohorts using routine CT scans, we open up VLSM techniques to a wealth of clinically relevant studies which can capitalise on using existing clinical brain imaging.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialThis study is not a clinical trial.Funding StatementThis work was funded by Stroke Association UK awards to ND (TSA2015_LECT02; TSA 2011/02) and MJM (SA PGF 18\100031) and was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) based at Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust. Neither the authors nor the institution received any payment or services from a third party for any aspect of the submitted work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:NHS National Research Ethics Committee, UKAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll behavioural summary data and analysis output files are openly available on the Open Science Framework47 (hhttps://osf.io/dc7ay/). All additional data is available upon request. https://osf.io/dc7ay/