RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 The impact of COVID-19 on children with oesophageal atresia and/or tracheo-oesophageal fistula (OA/TOF)
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.02.17.21251622
DO 10.1101/2021.02.17.21251622
A1 A. Stewart
A1 C. Smith
A1 S. Eaton
A1 P. De Coppi
A1 J. Wray
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/19/2021.02.17.21251622.abstract
AB Purpose The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a global health crisis of unparalleled magnitude. The direct risk to the health of children is low. However, disease containment measures have society-wide impacts. This study explored the pandemic experiences of parents of children with oesophageal atresia/tracheo-oesophageal fistula in the UK.Design An online forum was conducted using a private group on Facebook, in collaboration with a patient support group. Thematic analysis was used to identify key themes.Results The online forum ran between 7th November-18th December 2020 with 109 participants. Themes related to healthcare and non-healthcare impacts. Parents experienced changes and limitations to healthcare access, anxiety regarding health risks, “collateral” damage to well-being because of isolation and an impact on finances and employment. Parents described a transition from worry about direct health risks to concern about the impact of isolation on socialisation and development. A process of risk-benefit analysis led some to transition to a more “normal life”, while others continued to isolate. Benefits to their child’s health from isolation, positive experiences with remote healthcare and a gradual easing of anxiety were also identified.Implications and relevance This study highlights the wide-ranging impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on children and their families. Although focussed on oesophageal atresia/tracheo-oesophageal fistula, the emerging themes will be relevant to many children with complex, chronic health conditions. There are implications for healthcare delivery, including telehealth, during and after the pandemic period. Accurate and consistent messaging is required. Third sector organisations are ideally positioned support this.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementAlexandra Stewart is currently undertaking a PhD funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) (award reference: ICA-CDRF-2018-04-ST2-042).This publication indicates independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.Research at Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust is supported by the NIHR GOS/ICH Biomedical Research Centre.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study formed part of a larger study which was granted ethical approval by the London-Central Research Ethics Committee. It was confirmed that specific ethical approval for the online forum was not required as recruitment and data collection was conducted by a charity. Participants had no direct contact with the research team.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe nature of the qualitative data, whilst anonymised, would potentially allow for identification of participants and the data have therefore not been made available.