RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Evaluating the effect of COVID-19 on dispensing patterns: a national cohort analysis
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.02.15.21251552
DO 10.1101/2021.02.15.21251552
A1 Fatemeh Torabi
A1 Ashley Akbari
A1 Laura North
A1 Daniel Harris
A1 Gareth Davies
A1 Mike Gravenor
A1 Rowena Griffiths
A1 Jane Lyons
A1 Neil Jenkins
A1 Andrew Morris
A1 Julian Halcox
A1 Ronan A. Lyons
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/19/2021.02.15.21251552.abstract
AB Background Medication prescribing and dispensing often regarded as one of the most effective ways to manage and improve population health. Prescribed and dispensed medications can be monitored through data linkage for each patient. We hypothesised that changes in patient care resulting from COVID-19, changed the way patients access their prescribed medication.Objective To develop an efficient approach for evaluation of the impact of COVID-19 on drug dispensing patterns.Methods Retrospective observational study using national patient-level dispensing records in Wales-UK. Total dispensed drug items between 01-Jan-2016 and 31-Dec-2019 (counterfactual pre-COVID-19) were compared to 2020 (COVID-19 year). We compared trends of dispensed items in three main British National Formulary (BNF) sections(Cardiovascular system, Central Nervous System, Immunological & Vaccine) using European Age-Standardized rates. We developed an online tool to enable monitoring of changes in dispensing as the pandemic evolves.Result Amongst all BNF chapters, 52,357,639 items were dispensed in 2020 compared to 49,747,141 items in 2019 demonstrating a relative increase of 5.25% in 2020(95%CI[5.21,5.29]). Comparison of monthly patterns of 2020 and 2019 dispensed items showed a notable difference between the total number of dispensed drug items each month, with an average difference (D) of +290,055 and average Relative Change (RC) of +5.52%. The greatest RC was observed in a substantial March-2020 increase (D=+1,501,242 and RC=+28%), followed by second peak in June (D=+565,004, RC=+10.97%). May was characterised by lower dispensing (D=-399,244, RC=-5.9%). Cardiovascular categories were characterised, across all age groups, by dramatic March-2020 increases, at the epidemic peak, followed by months of lower than expected dispensing, and gradual recovery by September. The Central Nervous System category was similar, but with only a short decline in May, and quicker recovery. A stand-out grouping was Immunological and Vaccine, which dropped to very low levels across all age groups, and all months (including the March dispensing peak).Conclusions Aberration in clinical service delivery during COVID-19 led to substantial changes in community pharmacy drug dispensing. This change may contribute to a long-term burden of COVID-19, raising the importance of a comprehensive and timely monitoring of changes for evaluation of the potential impact on clinical care and outcomesCompeting Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the Medical Research Council [MR/V028367/1]; Health Data Research UK [HDR-9006] which receives its funding from the UK Medical Research Council, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, Economic and Social Research Council, Department of Health and Social Care (England), Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates, Health and Social Care Research and Development Division (Welsh Government), Public Health Agency (Northern Ireland), British Heart Foundation (BHF) and the Wellcome Trust; and Administrative Data Research UK which is funded by the Economic and Social Research Council [grant ES/S007393/1]. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The data used in this study are available in the SAIL Databank at Swansea University, Swansea, UK. All proposals to use SAIL data are subject to review by an independent Information Governance Review Panel (IGRP). Before any data can be accessed, approval must be given by the IGRP. The IGRP gives careful consideration to each project to ensure proper and appropriate use of SAIL data. When access has been approved, it is gained through a privacy-protecting safe haven and remote access system referred to as the SAIL Gateway. SAIL has established an application process to be followed by anyone who would like to access data via SAIL https://www.saildatabank.com/application-process. This study has been approved by SAIL Information Governance Review Panel (IGRP) under application/project number 0911 and all research conducted in this study has been completed under the permission and approval of the IGRP.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe aggregated results data used in this study is available for download from our website: https://wdds.ml/ with other materials such as code being accessible from repository at: https://github.com/SwanseaUniversityMedical/concept-library The main patient-level data sources used in this study are available in the SAIL Databank at Swansea University, Swansea, UK, but as restrictions apply they are not publicly available. All proposals to use SAIL data are subject to review by an independent Information Governance Review Panel (IGRP). Before any data can be accessed, approval must be given by the IGRP. The IGRP gives careful consideration to each project to ensure proper and appropriate use of SAIL data. When access has been granted, it is gained through a privacy protecting safe haven and remote access system referred to as the SAIL Gateway. SAIL has established an application process to be followed by anyone who would like to access data via SAIL at https://www.saildatabank.com/application-process/ https://wdds.ml/ https://github.com/SwanseaUniversityMedical/concept-library https://www.saildatabank.com/application-process/ DDifferenceRCRelative ChangeWDDSWelsh Dispensing DataSetC16Electronic cohort for period of 2016-2019 (3)C20Electronic cohort for 2020WDDSWelsh Dispensing DataSetCVSCardiovascular SystemsCNSCentral Nervous SystemsIVPImmunological Products and VaccinesNHS TRUDTerminology Reference-Data Update DistributionNHS BSANHS Business Services AuthorityTDITotal Dispensed ItemsDM+DDictionary of medicines and devicesBNFBritish National FormularyPop’nPopulation