TY - JOUR T1 - Co-development of a best practice checklist for mental health data science: A Delphi study JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.02.16.21251761 SP - 2021.02.16.21251761 AU - E.J. Kirkham AU - C.J. Crompton AU - M.H. Iveson AU - I. Beange AU - A. McIntosh AU - S. Fletcher-Watson Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/19/2021.02.16.21251761.abstract N2 - Background Mental health research is commonly affected by difficulties in recruiting and retaining participants, resulting in findings which are based on a sub-sample of those actually living with mental illness. Increasing the use of Big Data for mental health research, especially routinely-collected data, could improve this situation. However, steps to facilitate this must be enacted in collaboration with those who would provide the data - people with mental health conditions.Methods We used the Delphi method to create a best practice checklist for mental health data science. Twenty participants with both expertise in data science and personal experience of mental illness worked together over three phases. In the Phase 1, participants rated a list of 63 statements and added any statements or topics that were missing. Statements receiving a mean score of 5 or more (out of 7) were retained. These were then combined with the results of a rapid thematic analysis of participants’ comments to produce a 14-item draft checklist, with each item split into two components: best practice now and best practice in the future. In Phase 2, participants indicated whether or not each item should remain in the checklist, and items that scored more than 50% endorsement were retained. In Phase 3 participants rated their satisfaction with the final checklist.Results The final checklist was made up of 14 “best practice” items, with each item covering best practice now and best practice in the future. At the end of the three phases, 85% of participants were (very) satisfied with the two best practice checklists, with no participants expressing dissatisfaction.Conclusions Increased stakeholder involvement is essential at every stage of mental health data science. The checklist produced through this work represents the views of people with experience of mental illness, and it is hoped that it will be used to facilitate trustworthy and innovative research which is inclusive of a wider range of individuals.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis project has received funding from the Medical Research Council (grant number MC_PC_17209) and the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement number 847776). The funding bodies had no role in the design of the study, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data or in writing the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:School of Health in Social Science Research Ethics Committee, University of EdinburghAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data is available from the first author and will be made open access in due course. http://osf.io/9u8ad ER -