RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Experiences of supported isolation in returning travellers during the early COVID-19 response: an interview study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.02.17.21251735
DO 10.1101/2021.02.17.21251735
A1 H. Carter
A1 D. Weston
A1 N. Greenberg
A1 I. Oliver
A1 C. Robin
A1 G. J. Rubin
A1 S. Wessely
A1 R. Amlôt
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/19/2021.02.17.21251735.abstract
AB Objectives To understand the experiences of those who underwent supported isolation as part of the response to the COVID-19 pandemic, after returning to the UK from Wuhan, China.Design We used semi-structured interviews to capture participants’ experiences and perceptions of supported isolation.Setting Telephone interviews carried out within approximately one month of an individual leaving supported isolation.Participants 26 people who underwent supported isolation at either Arrowe Park Hospital (n = 18) or Kents Hill Park Conference Centre (n = 8) after being repatriated from Wuhan in January – February 2020.Results Participants were willing to undergo supported isolation because they understood that it would protect themselves and others. Positive treatment by staff was fundamental to participants’ willingness to comply with isolation procedures. Despite the high level of compliance, participants expressed some uncertainty about what the process would involve.Conclusions As hotel quarantine is introduced across the UK for international arrivals, our findings suggest that those in charge should: communicate effectively before, during and after quarantine, emphasising why quarantine is important and how it will protect others; avoid enforcement and focus on supporting and promoting voluntary compliance; facilitate shared social experiences for those in quarantine; and ensure all necessary supplies are provided. Doing so will increase adherence and reduce any negative effects on wellbeing.Competing Interest StatementAll authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form and declare HC, DW, IO, CR, and RA are current employees of Public Health England. GJR participates in the UKs Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies and its subgroups.Funding StatementHC, DW, GJR, NG, RA and SW are supported by the National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emergency Preparedness and Response, a partnership between Public Health England, Kings College London and the University of East Anglia. DW, IO, CR and RA are supported by the NIHR HPRU in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, a partnership between Public Health England and the University of Bristol. CR is also supported by the NIHR HPRU in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections and NIHR HPRU in Gastrointestinal Infections. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, Public Health England or the Department of Health and Social Care.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval was obtained from the Public Health England Research Ethics Governance Group (approval no. NR0187).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesFollowing peer review, data will be available on request from the corresponding author.