RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Comparison of infection control strategies to reduce COVID-19 outbreaks in homeless shelters in the United States: a simulation study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.09.28.20203166
DO 10.1101/2020.09.28.20203166
A1 Lloyd A.C. Chapman
A1 Margot Kushel
A1 Sarah N. Cox
A1 Ashley Scarborough
A1 Caroline Cawley
A1 Trang Nguyen
A1 Isabel Rodriguez-Barraquer
A1 Bryan Greenhouse
A1 Elizabeth Imbert
A1 Nathan C. Lo
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/19/2020.09.28.20203166.abstract
AB Background COVID-19 outbreaks have occurred in homeless shelters across the US, highlighting an urgent need to identify the most effective infection control strategy to prevent future outbreaks.Methods We developed a microsimulation model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in a homeless shelter and calibrated it to data from cross-sectional polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) surveys conducted during COVID-19 outbreaks in five shelters in three US cities from March 28 to April 10, 2020. We estimated the probability of averting a COVID-19 outbreak when an exposed individual is introduced into a representative homeless shelter of 250 residents and 50 staff over 30 days under different infection control strategies, including daily symptom-based screening, twice-weekly PCR testing and universal mask wearing.Results The proportion of PCR-positive residents and staff at the shelters with observed outbreaks ranged from 2.6% to 51.6%, which translated to basic reproduction number (R0) estimates of 2.9–6.2. The probability of averting an outbreak diminished with higher transmissibility (R0) within the simulated shelter and increasing incidence in the local community. With moderate community incidence (~30 confirmed cases/1,000,000 people/day), the estimated probabilities of averting an outbreak in a low-risk (R0=1.5), moderate-risk (R0=2.9), and high-risk (R0=6.2) shelter were, respectively: 0.35, 0.13 and 0.04 for daily symptom-based screening; 0.53, 0.20, and 0.09 for twice-weekly PCR testing; 0.62, 0.27 and 0.08 for universal masking; and 0.74, 0.42 and 0.19 for these strategies combined.Conclusions In high-risk homeless shelter environments and locations with high community incidence of COVID-19, even intensive infection control strategies (incorporating daily symptom-screening, frequent PCR testing and universal mask wearing) are unlikely to prevent outbreaks, suggesting a need for non-congregate housing arrangements for people experiencing homelessness. In lower-risk environments, combined interventions should be employed to reduce outbreak risk.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) and the UCSF Benioff Homelessness and Housing Initiative. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, preparation of the manuscript, or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was considered exempt non-human subject research based on use of de-identified secondary data by the University of California, San Francisco Institutional Review BoardAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data and code used for the analysis are available at: https://github.com/LloydChapman/COVID_homeless_modelling https://github.com/LloydChapman/COVID_homeless_modelling CIcredible intervalCOVID-19Coronavirus disease 2019PCRpolymerase chain reactionSARS-CoV-2Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2URuncertainty rangeUSUnited States