TY - JOUR T1 - Rapid Rise of S-Gene Target Failure and the UK variant B.1.1.7 among COVID-19 isolates in the Greater Toronto Area, Canada JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.02.09.21251225 SP - 2021.02.09.21251225 AU - Kevin A. Brown AU - Jonathan Gubbay AU - Jessica Hopkins AU - Samir Patel AU - Sarah A. Buchan AU - Nick Daneman AU - Lee Goneau Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/12/2021.02.09.21251225.abstract N2 - A novel variant of SARS-CoV-2, B.1.1.7, originally discovered in the United Kingdom (UK), is rapidly overtaking other strains around the globe. In certain assays, absence of detection of the S-gene target, also known as S-gene target failure (SGTF) can be a sensitive surrogate of B.1.1.7. We analyzed daily counts of SGTF among samples from Dynacare Laboratory Ontario (which draws samples from the Greater Toronto Area) and resulted between December 16, 2020 and February 3, 2021. We identified 11,485 positive COVID-19 tests, of which 448 had SGTF (3.9%). The estimated prevalence of SGTF rose from 2.0% on December 16 to 15.2% on February 3 (1.8-fold weekly increase, 95%CI: 1.5, 2.2). The estimated reproduction number for SGTF cases was 1.17 (95%CI: 0.94 to 1.46), while the reproduction number for non-SGTF cases was 0.82 (95%CI: 0.65 to 1.01); the relative reproduction number was 1.44 (95%CI: 1.03, 1.99). 59 samples were sent for confirmatory testing, of which 53 (90%) were identified as B.1.1.7 using whole genome sequencing or found to have the N501Y mutation. In order to pre-emptively plan and implement public health measures to control COVID-19 now and through the spring, accurate and up-to-date early warning systems for new variants, including B.1.1.7, are essential across North America and the globe.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work did not receive external funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Public Health Ontario Ethics Review Board has determined that this project did not require research ethics committee approval as the activities described in this manuscript were conducted in fulfillment of Public Health Ontario's legislated mandate "to provide scientific and technical advice and support to the health care system and the Government of Ontario in order to protect and promote the health of Ontarians" (Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion Act, SO 2007, c 10) and are therefore considered public health practice, not research.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll primary analyses in the manuscript are based on the case counts presented in Figure 1, and can be retrieved directly from the figure. ER -