TY - JOUR T1 - Association between genes regulating neural pathways for quantitative traits of speech and language disorders JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.02.09.21251441 SP - 2021.02.09.21251441 AU - Penelope Benchek AU - Robert P Igo, Jr. AU - Heather Voss-Hoynes AU - Yvonne Wren AU - Gabrielle Miller AU - Barbara Truitt AU - Wen Zhang AU - Michael Osterman AU - Lisa Freebairn AU - Jessica Tag AU - H. Gerry Taylor AU - E. Ricky Chan AU - Panos Roussos AU - Barbara Lewis AU - Catherine M. Stein AU - Sudha K. Iyengar Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/12/2021.02.09.21251441.abstract N2 - Speech sound disorders (SSD) manifest as difficulties in phonological memory and awareness, oral motor function, language, vocabulary, reading and spelling. Families enriched for SSD are rare, and typically display a cluster of deficits. We conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) in 435 children from 148 families in the Cleveland Family Speech and Reading study (CFSRS), examining 16 variables representing 6 domains. Replication was conducted using the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC). We identified 18 significant loci (combined p<10−8) that we pursued bioinformatically. We prioritized 5 novel gene regions with likely functional repercussions on neural pathways, some which colocalized with differentially methylated regions in our sample. Polygenic risk scores for receptive language, expressive vocabulary, phonological awareness, phonological memory, spelling, and reading decoding associated with increasing clinical severity. In summary, neural genetic influence on SSD is primarily multigenic and acts on genomic regulatory elements, similar to other neurodevelopmental disorders.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by NIH grant R01DC000528 awarded to Dr. Lewis and R01DC012380 awarded to Dr. Iyengar.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the ALSPAC Ethics and Law Committee and Institutional Review Board of Case Medical Center and University Hospitals.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesIndividual-level data from the Cleveland study are not available for broad sharing because of IRB restrictions; summary statistics may be obtained by request from Dr. Sudha Iyengar, ski{at}case.edu. ALSPAC data are available through an application process to ALSPAC. ER -