RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Effect of Adapted Ergometer Setup and Rowing Speed on Lower Extremity Loading in People with and without Spinal Cord Injury
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.02.08.21251109
DO 10.1101/2021.02.08.21251109
A1 Fang, Ying
A1 Troy, Karen L.
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/10/2021.02.08.21251109.abstract
AB Introduction Functional electrical stimulation assisted rowing (FES-rowing) on an adapted ergometer is used in spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation. A primary goal is to mechanically load the lower extremity to prevent disuse osteoporosis. Recent studies reported the small foot reaction force in FES-rowing was not sufficient to prevent bone loss.Objective This study aims to investigate the effect of ergometer setup and rowing speed on lower extremity loading in able-bodied and SCI individuals.Design Twenty able-bodied novice rowers and one experienced SCI rower rowed on an adapted ergometer with different speeds and setups. Motion capture system and force sensors were used to calculate forces and moments at the knee.Main Outcome Measures Foot reaction force and knee moment for all participants, and tibiofemoral force of the SCI rower.Results Peak foot reaction forces of able-bodied rowers ranged from 0.28 – 0.45 body weights (BW), which was less than half the force in normal rowing. A fast rowing speed, forward seat position, and large knee RoM were associated with higher foot force and knee moment during able-bodied rowing. The SCI subject had the greatest foot reaction force (0.40 BW) when rowing with small knee RoM at a rear seat position and the highest tibiofemoral force (2.23 BW) with large knee RoM at a rear seat position.Conclusion Ergometer setup and speed can double the force generation at the foot during both able-bodied rowing and FES-rowing. Rowing forms (range of motion and speed) that resulted in the greatest foot reaction force were different for able-bodied rowers and SCI rowers, indicating a trade-off between motion and force generation in FES-rowing that warrants further investigation with more SCI rowers. Clinicians and physical therapist should be aware that ergometer setups can be easily adjusted to modify rowing forms and loading patterns of users with SCI.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialThis study, which included 20 able-bodied participants and 1 participant with SCI, is not a clinical trial.Funding StatementThis research was supported in part by a Grant In Aid from the American Society of Biomechanics (YF). The adapted ergometer was donated by the laboratory of Dr. Leslie Morse.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the institutional review board of Worcester Polytechnic Institute (IRB# 1; HHS IRB # 00007374).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThere is no supplementary material.