TY - JOUR T1 - Population-Based Study of anti-SARS-CoV-2, Social Distancing and Government Responses in Joinville, Brazil JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.02.08.21251009 SP - 2021.02.08.21251009 AU - Henrique Diegoli AU - Vivianne Samara Conzatti AU - Suleimy Cristina Mazin AU - Juliana Safanelli AU - Louise Domenguini Chiaradia Dellatorre AU - Keli Bett AU - Roselaine Elisa Radtke AU - Giulia Murillo Wollmann AU - Helbert do Nascimento Lima AU - Paulo Henrique Condeixa de França AU - Jean Rodrigues da Silva Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/10/2021.02.08.21251009.abstract N2 - Background The city of Joinville had been mildly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic until June 2020. This study aimed to longitudinally assess the prevalence of exposure to the virus and social distancing practices in the local population.Methods A randomized selection of households stratified by region was created. From June 15 to August 7, 2020, a dweller was randomized in each household, answered a questionnaire, and performed a test for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The prevalence of positive tests was calculated for each week and adjusted for the test’s sensitivity and specificity.Results The adjusted proportion of positive results increased from 1.4% in the first week (margin of error [ME] 0% to 2.87%) to 13.38% in the eighth week (ME 10.22% to 16.54%). Among the 213 participants that tested positive, 55 (25.82%) were asymptomatic. Only 37 (17.37%) sought medical consultation for any symptom. Among the 77 (36.15%) that were leaving home to work or study, only 18 (23.38%) stopped due to any symptom. The proportion that referred going to bars, restaurants, or making non-essential shopping decreased from 20.56% in the first week to 8.61% during the peak of diagnoses.Conclusion The low proportion of participants that sought medical consultation or stopped leaving home indicates strategies directed to isolate only those symptomatic reach a low proportion of infected patients.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe study was supported through the provision of professionals, working environment, and equipment by the Secretariat of Health of Joinville, the Secretariat of Health of the Santa Catarina State, and Brazil's Ministry of Health.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of "Hospital Dona Helena - CEP/HDH", updated on October 2020, approval number CAAE 37962620.6.0000.8062.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe anonymized data supporting the findings of the study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. ER -