@article {Gill2021.02.05.21251217, author = {Thomas M. Gill and Emma X. Zang and Terrence E. Murphy and Linda Leo-Summers and Evelyne A. Gahbauer and Natalia Festa and Jason R. Falvey and Ling Han}, title = {Neighborhood Disadvantage and Active, Disabled and Total Life Expectancy Among Community-living Older Persons}, elocation-id = {2021.02.05.21251217}, year = {2021}, doi = {10.1101/2021.02.05.21251217}, publisher = {Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press}, abstract = {Background Neighborhood disadvantage is a novel social determinant of health that could adversely affect the functional well-being and longevity of older persons. We evaluated whether estimates of active, disabled and total life expectancy differ on the basis of neighborhood disadvantage after accounting for individual-level socioeconomic characteristics and other prognostic factors.Methods We used data on 754 community-living older persons from South Central Connecticut, who completed monthly assessments of disability from 1998 to 2020. Scores on the area deprivation index were dichotomized at the 80th state percentile to distinguish neighborhoods that were disadvantaged (81-100) from those that were not (1-80).Results Within 5-year age increments from 70 to 90, active and total life expectancy were consistently lower in participants from neighborhoods that were disadvantaged versus not disadvantaged, and these differences persisted and remained statistically significant after adjustment for individual-level race/ethnicity, education, income, and other prognostic factors. At age 70, adjusted estimates (95\% CI) for active and total life expectancy (in years) were 12.3 (11.5-13.1) and 15.0 (13.8-16.1) in the disadvantaged group and 14.2 (13.5-14.7) and 16.7 (15.9-17.5) in the non-disadvantaged group. At each age, participants from disadvantaged neighborhoods spent a greater percentage of their projected remaining life disabled, relative to those from non-disadvantaged neighborhoods, with adjusted values (SE) ranging from 17.7 (0.8) vs. 15.3 (0.5) at age 70 to 55.0 (1.7) vs. 48.1 (1.3) at age 90.Conclusions Living in a disadvantaged neighborhood is associated with lower active and total life expectancy and a greater percentage of projected remaining life disabled.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe work for this report was funded by a grant from the National Institute on Aging (R01AG17560). The study was conducted at the Yale Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center (P30AG21342).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This project was approved by the Human Investigation Committee at Yale University.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesDr. Gill had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.}, URL = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/08/2021.02.05.21251217}, eprint = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/08/2021.02.05.21251217.full.pdf}, journal = {medRxiv} }