RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Life Expectancy and Voting Patterns in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.10.26.20220111
DO 10.1101/2020.10.26.20220111
A1 Curtis, Lesley H.
A1 Hoffman, Molly N.
A1 Califf, Robert M.
A1 Hammill, Bradley G.
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/05/2020.10.26.20220111.abstract
AB Introduction In the 2016 U.S. Presidential election, voters in communities with recent stagnation or decline in life expectancy were more likely to vote for the Republican candidate than in prior Presidential elections. We aimed to assess the association between change in life expectancy and voting patterns in the 2020 Presidential election.Methods With data on county-level life expectancy from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation and voting data from GitHub, we used weighted multivariable linear regression to estimate the association between the change in life expectancy from 1980 to 2014 and the proportion of votes for the Republican candidate in the 2020 Presidential election.Results Among 3,110 U.S counties and Washington, D.C., change in life expectancy at the county level was negatively associated with Republican share of the vote in the 2020 Presidential election (parameter estimate −7.2, 95% confidence interval, −7.8 to −6.6). With the inclusion of state, sociodemographic, and economic variables in the model, the association was attenuated (parameter estimate −0.8; 95% CI, −1.5 to −0.2).Conclusion Counties with a less positive trajectory in life expectancy were more likely to vote for Republican candidates in the 2020 U.S. Presidential election, but the association was mediated by demographic, social and economic factors.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding was received for this work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was determined exempt by the Duke Health Institutional Review Board.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data used in the manuscript are publicly available. Links are provided below and referenced in the manuscript. https://github.com/tonmcg/US_County_Level_Election_Results_08-20 https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/urban_rural.htm#Data_Files_and_Documentation https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/data.html http://ghdx.healthdata.org/record/ihme-data/united-states-life-expectancy-and-age-specific-mortality-risk-county-1980-2014