TY - JOUR T1 - How radical is radical cure? Site-specific biases in phase-III clinical trials underestimate the effect of radical cure against <em>Plasmodium vivax</em> hypnozoites JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.01.28.21250689 SP - 2021.01.28.21250689 AU - John H. Huber AU - Cristian Koepfli AU - Guido EspaƱa AU - Narimane Nekkab AU - Michael T. White AU - T. Alex Perkins Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/03/2021.01.28.21250689.abstract N2 - Background Plasmodium vivax relapses caused by reactivating hypnozoites are a major barrier for elimination and control of this form of malaria. Radical cure is a form of therapy capable of addressing this problem. Recent clinical trials of radical cure have yielded efficacy estimates ranging from 65% to 94%, with substantial variation across trial sites. We performed an analysis of simulated trial data using a transmission model to demonstrate that variation in efficacy estimates across trial sites can arise from differences in the conditions under which trials are conducted.Methods and Findings Our analysis revealed that differences in transmission intensity, heterogeneous exposure, and relapse rate can yield efficacy estimates ranging as wide as 11-82%, despite simulating trial data under the uniform assumption that treatment had a 75% chance of clearing hypnozoites. A longer duration of prophylaxis leads to a greater measured efficacy, particularly at higher transmission intensities, making the comparison of the protection of different radical cure treatment regimens against relapse more challenging. We show that vector control and parasite genotyping offer two potential means to yield more standardized efficacy estimates that better reflect protection against relapse.Conclusions We predict that site-specific biases are likely to contribute to variation in efficacy estimates both within and across phase-III clinical trials. Future clinical trials can reduce site-specific biases by conducting trials in low-transmission settings where reinfections from mosquito biting are less common, by preventing reinfections using vector control measures, or by identifying and excluding reinfections that occur during follow-up using parasite genotyping methods.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementJHH acknowledges funding from a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship and a Richard and Peggy Notebaert Premier Fellowship from the University of Notre Dame. CK received funding from NIH R21-AI137891. NN and MTW were supported by a grant from Medicine for Malaria Venture. NN also received funding from a Pasteur Roux-Cantarini Fellowship. This publication was made possible with partial support from Grant Numbers TL1 TR002531 and UL1TR002529 (A. Shekhar, PI) from the National Institutes of Health, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Clinical and Translational Sciences Award. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:IRB approval was not required for this work, because no human data was used.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll code to reproduce the analyses in this study is available on Github at https://github.com/johnhhuber/Radical_Cure_Uncertainty. ER -