@article {Hou2021.01.29.21250791, author = {Danlin Hou and Ali Katal and Liangzhu (Leon) Wang}, title = {Bayesian Calibration of Using CO2 Sensors to Assess Ventilation Conditions and Associated COVID-19 Airborne Aerosol Transmission Risk in Schools}, elocation-id = {2021.01.29.21250791}, year = {2021}, doi = {10.1101/2021.01.29.21250791}, publisher = {Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press}, abstract = {Ventilation rate plays a significant role in preventing the airborne transmission of diseases in indoor spaces. Classrooms are a considerable challenge during the COVID-19 pandemic because of large occupancy density and mainly poor ventilation conditions. The indoor CO2 level may be used as an index for estimating the ventilation rate and airborne infection risk. In this work, we analyzed a one-day measurement of CO2 levels in three schools to estimate the ventilation rate and airborne infection risk. Sensitivity analysis and Bayesian calibration methods were applied to identify uncertainties and calibrate key parameters. The outdoor ventilation rate with a 95\% confidence was 1.96 {\textpm} 0.31ACH for Room 1 with mechanical ventilation and fully open window, 0.40 {\textpm} 0.08 ACH for Rooms 2, and 0.79 {\textpm} 0.06 ACH for Room 3 with only windows open. A time-averaged CO2 level \< 450 ppm is equivalent to a ventilation rate \> 10 ACH in all three rooms. We also defined the probability of the COVID-19 airborne infection risk associated with ventilation uncertainties. The outdoor ventilation threshold to prevent classroom COVID-19 aerosol spreading is between 3 {\textendash} 8 ACH, and the CO2 threshold is around 500 ppm of a school day (\< 8 hr) for the three schools.Practical Implications The actual outdoor ventilation rate in a room cannot be easily measured, but it can be calculated by measuring the transient indoor CO2 level. Uncertainty in input parameters can result in uncertainty in the calculated ventilation rate. Our three classrooms study shows that the estimated ventilation rate considering various input parameters{\textquoteright} uncertainties is between {\textpm} 8-20 \%. As a result, the uncertainty of the ventilation rate contributes to the estimated COVID-19 airborne aerosol infection risk{\textquoteright}s uncertainty up to {\textpm} 10 \%. Other studies can apply the proposed Bayesian and MCMC method to estimating building ventilation rates and airborne aerosol infection risks based on actual measurement data such as CO2 levels with uncertainties and sensitivity of input parameters identified. The outdoor ventilation rate and CO2 threshold values as functions of exposure times could be used as the baseline models to develop correlations to be implemented by cheap/portable sensors to be applied in similar situations to monitor ventilation conditions and airborne risk levels.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe research is supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada through the Discovery Grants Program [$\#$RGPIN-2018-06734] and the Advancing Climate Change Science in Canada Program [$\#$ACCPJ 535986-18].Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:No IRB needed.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, LW, upon reasonable request.}, URL = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/03/2021.01.29.21250791}, eprint = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/03/2021.01.29.21250791.full.pdf}, journal = {medRxiv} }