RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Dysgraphic features in motor neuron disease: a review
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.01.31.21250861
DO 10.1101/2021.01.31.21250861
A1 Nicolò Aiello, Edoardo
A1 Feroldi, Sarah
A1 Preti, Alice Naomi
A1 Zago, Stefano
A1 Appollonio, Ildebrando Marco
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/01/2021.01.31.21250861.abstract
AB Background Motor neuron disease (MND) patients can show oral language deficits mimicking those of frontotemporal degenerations (FTD). Although dysgraphic features have been also reported within the MND-FTD continuum, their characteristics and clinical relevance are still largely unexplored.Aims To profile writing disorders in MND patients can help further define their cognitive semiology and thus conveys relevant clinical entailments. Therefore, this study aimed at reviewing evidence of writing impairment in MND patients. This review was implemented and reported by consulting Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Qualitative/quantitative measures of writing abilities in MND patients was the primary outcome. Both group studies and case reports/series were taken into consideration. Twenty-four contributions were included out of an initial N=83. Potential biases in generalizing results were qualitatively controlled for by extracting background, disease-related, neuropsychological and neuroanatomofunctional secondary outcomes.Main Contribution Fifteen studies assessed writing abilities in Japaneses patients, whereas the remaining eight in western patients. Central dysgraphic features were reported in both neuropsychologically-impaired and –unimpaired MND patients. Phonetic/phonological paragraphias and morpho-syntactic errors were frequently reported. Although FTD was frequently co-occurent, neither cognitive nor language impairment fully accounted for writing impairment in some patients. By contrast, evidence of peripheral dysgraphia was scarce. Patients displaying writing deficits often presented with bulbar signs and perisylvian cortices involvement (including Exner’s area and the left angular gyrus). Writing deficits proved to be associated with abnormalities in executive functioning and its neural substrates. Writing-to-dictation tasks as well as writing samples assessment proved to be useful to detect writing errors.Conclusions Dysgraphic features in MND patients might be due to dysfunctions of the graphemic buffer – and possibly the phonological route. The lexico-semantic route appeared to be less involved. However, a mixed peripheral/central involvement cannot be ruled out. In this population, executive/attentive deficits are likely to contribute to writing errors as well. Writing deficits might thus be specific of MND patients’ cognitive/language impairment profile. The evaluation of writing abilities via writing-to-dictation/narrative writing tasks may be useful when assessing cognition/language in both neuropsychological-impaired and -unimpaired MND patients - especially when severe dysarthria/anarthria is present and prevents clinicians from assessing oral language.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study did not receive any specific funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:No Ethical approva was needed for this study to be implemented since it is a review on already published data.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesNo datasets are associated to this manuscript.