RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Discontinuation of isolation for persons with COVID-19: Is 10 days really safe?
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.01.29.21250753
DO 10.1101/2021.01.29.21250753
A1 Felix, Alvina Clara
A1 de Paula, Anderson V
A1 Ribeiro, Andreia Cristina
A1 da Silva, Francini Camila
A1 Inemami, Marta
A1 Costa, Angela A
A1 Leal, Cibele Odete D
A1 Figueiredo, Walter M
A1 Sérgio Pannuti, Claudio
A1 Romano, Camila Malta
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/02/01/2021.01.29.21250753.abstract
AB Background The detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in respiratory samples from COVID-19 patients is not a direct indication of the presence of viable viruses. The isolation of SARS-CoV-2 in cell culture system however, can acts as surrogate marker of infectiousness. Cell culture based studies performed mostly with hospitalized and moderate/severe COVID-19 claims that no replication competent virus is found after 9 days of the symptoms onset in respiratory samples. Therefore, it is now recommended 10 days isolation before patient discharge.Methods We cell-cultured 29 SARS-COV-2 RT-PCR positive respiratory samples at the 10th day after the illness in Vero E6 cells. After two passages, cytopathic effect and cycle threshold (CT) lower than the obtained in the original sample were used to determine positivity.Findings We found viable particles in (7/29) 24% of samples tested. The positivity in cell culture was strongly associated (p<0.0001) to the low cycle thresholds in clinical samples (Ct <21).Conclusion This data adds important knowledge to the current protocols for de-isolation of patients with non-hospitalized mild COVID-19.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) grant 2019/03859-9; and Brazilian National Research Council (CNPq), grant 402794/2020-6.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The project was approved by the Ethical committee from the Medical School of the University of Sao Paulo (CAPPESQ # 4.235.245).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.Yesno new data was generated in this work. Detailed information regarding the results are available upon request.