%0 Journal Article %A Mateus dos Santos Viana %A Thomaz Emanoel Azevedo Silva %A Gabriela Oliveira Bagano %A Bruna de Sá Barreto Pontes %A Milton Henrique Vitoria de Melo %A Pedro Henrique Correia Filgueiras %A Andre Costa Meireles %A Paula Oliveira de Andrade Lopes %A Andre Luiz Freitas de Oliveira Junior %A João Vitor Miranda de Oliveira Porto %A Vitor Calixto de Almeida Correia %A Luis Claudio Lemos Correia %T Lack of Accuracy of the GRACE score to Predict Coronary Anatomy in Acute Coronary Syndromes %D 2021 %R 10.1101/2021.01.26.21250301 %J medRxiv %P 2021.01.26.21250301 %X Introduction Coronary anatomy is one of the strongest risk predictors in Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS), which justifies early coronary angiography. Diagnostic scores for predicting outcomes are usually superior to clinical judgment. Despite being validated for prognosis, the GRACE score has been used to discriminate patients with high or low probability of anatomical severity.Objective To test the hypothesis that the GRACE score actually predicts anatomical severity.Methods The study was carried out by assessing consecutive patients with ACS who underwent invasive angiography. Severe anatomical disease was defined as obstructive involvement (≥ 70% in diameter) in (1) left main coronary artery or (2) double or triple vessel disease involving proximal left anterior descending artery or (3) subocclusion. The GRACE score was evaluated under numerical and dichotomous tests.Results A total of 733 patients were evaluated, aged 63 ± 14 years, 61% male and GRACE score of 119 ± 37. Obstructive coronary disease was observed in 81% of the patients, classified as one, two or three vessel disease, or left main coronary artery involvement in 28%, 23%, 26% and 4%, respectively. The area under the ROC curve of the GRACE score was 0.65 (95% CI = 0.61 - 0.69) for predicting severe disease. The cutoff point below which the first GRACE tertile is defined (109) was used to dichotomize low-risk (N = 318) and medium-high-risk (N = 415) samples. This standard definition of intermediate-high risk by the GRACE score (> 109) revealed sensitivity of 67% in detecting severe anatomy (95% CI = 61% - 72%) and specificity of 50% (95% CI = 46% - 55%), resulting in positive likelihood ratio of 1.3 (95% CI = 1.2 - 1.5) and negative likelihood ratio of 0.66 (95% CI = 0.55 - 0.80). There was a weak correlation between GRACE and anatomical scores such as SYNTAX (r = 0.36, P < 0.001) and Gensini (r = 0.36, P < 0.001).Conclusion Despite statistical association with extent of anatomical coronary disease, the GRACE Score is not accurate to predict severity of disease before coronary angiography.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFunding: None.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This is a paper derived from a prospective cohort (Registry of Acute Coronary Syndromes / RESCA) of individuals admitted to a coronary care unit of a tertiary hospital in the city of Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. It was approved by the research ethics committee of this hospital (Hospital Sao Rafael), approval number 3.994.711 on April 28, 2020 and the research cohort is registered in the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development / CNPQ(dgp.cnpq.br/dgp/espelhogrupo/0778991926507817), consisting of medical students and medical researchers with an area of interest in cardiology and risk prediction in acute coronary syndromes.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data were properly stored, under confidentiality and are are available upon reasonable request. Data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. %U https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2021/01/28/2021.01.26.21250301.full.pdf