RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Development of quantitative frailty and mortality prediction models on older patients as a palliative care needs assessment tool
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.01.22.21249726
DO 10.1101/2021.01.22.21249726
A1 Vicent Blanes-Selva
A1 Ascensión Doñate-Martínez
A1 Gordon Linklater
A1 Juan M. García-Gómez
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/01/26/2021.01.22.21249726.abstract
AB Background Palliative care (PC) has demonstrated benefits for life-limiting illnesses. Cancer patients have mainly accessed these services, but there is growing consensus about the importance of promoting access for patients with non-malignant disease. Bad survival prognosis and patient’s frailty are usual dimensions to decide PC inclusion.Objectives The main aim of this work is to design and evaluate three quantitative models based on machine learning approaches to predict frailty and mortality on older patients in the context of supporting PC decision making: one-year mortality, survival regression and one-year frailty classification.Methods The dataset used in this study is composed of 39,310 hospital admissions for 19,753 older patients (age >= 65) from January 1st, 2011 to December 30th, 2018. All prediction models were based on Gradient Boosting Machines. From the initial pool of variables at hospital admission, 20 were selected by a recursive feature elimination algorithm based on the random forest’s GINI importance criterion. Besides, we run an independent grid search to find the best hyperparameters in each model. The evaluation was performed by 10-fold cross-validation and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and mean absolute error were reported. The Cox proportional-hazards model was used to compare our proposed approach with classical survival methods.Results The one-year mortality model achieved an AUC ROC of 0.87 ± 0.01; the mortality regression model achieved an MAE of 329.97 ± 5.24 days. The one-year frailty classification reported an AUC ROC of 0.9 ± 0.01. The Spearman’s correlation between the admission frailty index and the survival time was –0.1, while the point-biserial correlation between one-year frailty index and survival time was –0.16.Conclusions One-year mortality model performance is at a state-of-the-art level. Frailty Index used in this study behaves coherently with other works in the literature. One-year frailty classifier demonstrated that frailty status within the year could be predicted accurately. To our knowledge, this is the first study predicting one-year frailty status based on a frailty index. We found mortality and frailty as two weakly correlated and complementary PC needs assessment criteria. Predictive models are available online at http://demoiapc.upv.es.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the InAdvance project (H2020-SC1-BHC-2018-2020 No. 825750.) and the ALBATROSS project (PID2019-104978RB-I00). Special thanks to Angel Sanchez-Garcia for his contributions to the websiteAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This procedure was assessed and approved by the Ethical Committee of the University and Polytechnic La Fe Hospital of Valencia (registration number: 2019-88-1).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data is NOT publicly available