RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Comparison of Carotid Intima Media Thickness between Women with History of Preeclampsia and Normal Pregnancy: A Meta-Analysis of Systematic Review
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.01.24.21250392
DO 10.1101/2021.01.24.21250392
A1 Budi Susetyo Pikir
A1 Agus Subagjo
A1 Deasy Eka Wardhani
A1 Andrianto
A1 Yudi Her Oktaviono
A1 Ricardo Adrian Nugraha
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/01/25/2021.01.24.21250392.abstract
AB Background Women with a history of preeclampsia are twice as likely to experience long term cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared to women with unaffected pregnancy. The pathophysiology of preeclampsia is not well understood, however there is general agreement that, similar to cardiovascular disease, endothelial dysfunction plays a crucial role. On a clinical level, preeclampsia and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease share common risk factors. Carotid intima media thickness (CIMT) is ultrasound-based imaging, non-invasive, simple and reproducible method of subclinical atherosclerosis evaluation. Nowadays, there were studies concerning of CIMT among preeclamptic women, although the results were different.Objective To prove that CIMT among women with histories of preeclampsia was greater compared to normal pregnancy.Methods We conducted a meta-analysis of studies that reported CIMT, in women who had preeclampsia and had normal pregnancy. Studies were identified through three databases: PubMed, Google Scholar dan SAGE Journals with publication year of 2010- 2020. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Standardized mean difference was used as measured of effect size.Results Nine eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis. This meta-analysis consisted of 439 women with preeclampsia histories and 526 women with normal pregnancy histories. Women who had preeclampsia had significantly higher CIMT compared to those with normal pregnancy with standardized mean difference −0.38 and 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.68 to −0.07 (p=0.02).Conclusion CIMT was greater among women with histories of preeclampsia compared to normal pregnancy.Prospero registration number ID 228825.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialPROSPERO ID 228825Funding StatementNil.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Universitas Airlangga Institutional Review BoardAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to protecting participant confidentiality but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.