@article {Julario2021.01.15.21249916, author = {Rerdin Julario and Ricardo Adrian Nugraha and Bagus Putra Dharma Khrisna and Tony Santoso Putra and Eka Prasetya Budi Mulia and Ryan Enast Intan and Firas Farisi Alkaff}, title = {Simple Laboratory and Clinical Parameters as Predictor for Electrocardiographic Abnormalities Among Hospitalized Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study}, elocation-id = {2021.01.15.21249916}, year = {2021}, doi = {10.1101/2021.01.15.21249916}, publisher = {Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press}, abstract = {Background In developing countries, even electrocardiography (ECG) hasn{\textquoteright}t been used widely in most health-care centers. The ability of physicians to refer to chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients for ECG, often collide with several barriers and costs. Therefore, we need to formulate the simplest and most efficient model to predict when CKD patients need to be referred due to potential ECG abnormalities.Objective The aim of this study was to develop several clinical and laboratory parameters as a predictor of any ECG abnormalities.Materials and Methods A retrospective cross-sectional study design held at Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia. Subjects were hospitalized patients with CKD between 1 January to 31 December 2019. 198 CKD patients (101 males) were enrolled for the study. All patients had demographic information, detailed clinical profile, resting 12-lead ECG recording, complete blood count, serum electrolyte and renal function test profile during admission and results were interpreted blindly by two cardiologists. Statistical analysis was done by SPSS 17.0.Results A total of 198 patients were included in this study. Mean ages were 52.2{\textpm}11.8 years old and fifty-one percent were males. Eighty-eight percent of patients from 198 patients had ECG abnormality. AUC of hemoglobin level to discriminate poor R wave progression, pathological Q wave, non-spesific ST-T changes, and frontal axis deviation were 0.532, 0.641, 0.556 and 0.693, respectively. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, only higher systolic blood pressure was determined as an independent predictor of abnormal ECG finding in CKD patients, as systolic blood pressure increase by one unit, the odds of having abnormal ECG is increased 1.02 times (95\% CI: 1.00 {\textendash} 1.02, p=0.042).Conclusion The ECG abnormalities can be found in hospitalized CKD patients. Fragmented QRS and long QTc were the highest prevalent ECG abnormalities in our study. Serum creatinine and hemoglobin could predict peaked T wave and prolonged QTc among hospitalized CKD patients. Systolic blood pressure could predict prolonged QTc and fragmented QRS in CKD patients.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNone declaredAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Institutional ethics and research committee approved the study. Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital conferred ethical clearance for this study. Compliance with ethical standards, this research proposal was approved by the ethical committees of Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital in collaboration with Universitas Airlangga College of Medicine Research Ethics Council (Ref: 1811/KEPK/II/2020) under the name of Rerdin Julario as the Principal Investigator.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to protecting participant confidentiality but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.}, URL = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/01/20/2021.01.15.21249916}, eprint = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/01/20/2021.01.15.21249916.full.pdf}, journal = {medRxiv} }