PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Gluning, I
AU  - Kerac, M
AU  - Bailey, J
AU  - Bander, A
AU  - Opondo, C
TI  - The management of Moderate Acute Malnutrition (MAM) in children aged 6-59 months: A systematic review and meta-analysis
AID  - 10.1101/2021.01.16.21249861
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.01.16.21249861
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/01/20/2021.01.16.21249861.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/01/20/2021.01.16.21249861.full
AB  - Background Malnutrition is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in children aged under five years, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Although severe acute malnutrition (SAM) is considered the most serious form of malnutrition, moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) affects greater numbers globally and, unlike SAM, guidelines lack a robust evidence-base. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the evidence for lipid-based nutrient supplements (LNS), fortified-blended-flours (FBF) and nutrition counselling, in the treatment of MAM.Methods Five databases were systematically searched for studies conducted in LMICs that compared the effectiveness of food-based products versus any comparator group in promoting recovery from MAM in children aged 6-59 months. Where appropriate, pooled estimates of effect were estimated using random-effects meta-analyses.Results A total of thirteen trials were identified for inclusion. All used active controls rather than ‘standard care’, which is often minimal in most settings. There was evidence of increased probability of recovery (as assessed by gaining normal weight-for-height and/or MUAC) among children treated with LNS compared to children treated with FBF (RR 1·05, 95%CI 1·01-1·09, p=0·009). Treatment with an LNS was also associated with a lower risk of persistent MAM at the end of treatment compared with a FBF (RR 0·82, 95%CI 0·71-0·95, p=0·007).Conclusion Based on a relatively small number of studies mainly from Africa, LNS are superior to FBF in improving anthropometric recovery from MAM. The true benefit of MAM treatment may be underestimated due to all studies using active controls rather than usual care which is minimal.More high-quality evidence is needed to evaluate nutrition education/counselling alone as a MAM intervention. Studies should also assess a wider range of outcomes including body composition, morbidity and development – not weight-gain alone.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=68513&RecordID=68513 Funding StatementThere was no funding source.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesSystematic review of the literature. Meta-analysis pooled data and do-files available upon request to corresponding author.AMAcute MalnutritionCCCChild Centred CounsellingCCTControlled-Clinical TrialsCIConfidence IntervalComPASCombined Protocol for Acute Malnutrition StudyCSBCorn-Soy BlendFBFFortified Blended FloursFFMFat-Free MassFFMIFat-Free Mass IndexHAZHeight-for-Age z-scoreHFIASHousehold Food Insecurity Access ScaleHIVHuman Immunodeficiency VirusLMICLow- and Middle-Income CountryLNSLipid-based Nutrient SupplementMAMModerate Acute MalnutritionMSBPMalted-Sorghum Based PorridgeMUACMiddle Upper Arm CircumferenceNCHSNational Centre for Health StatisticsPICOPoint, Intervention, Comparator, OutcomePRISMAPreferred Reporting-Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-AnalysesRCTRandomised-Controlled TrialRRRelative RiskRUFReady-to-Use FoodRUSFReady-to-Use Supplementary FoodRUTFReady-to-Use Therapeutic FoodSAMSevere Acute MalnutritionSFPSupplementary Feeding ProgrammeTBTuberculosisUNUnited NationsUNICEFUnited Nations Children’s FundWFPWorld Food ProgrammeWHOWorld Health OrganisationWLZWeight-for-length z-scoreWHZWeight-for-Height z-score